2021
DOI: 10.1017/s0020589321000348
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

ASSESSING THE IMPLICATIONS OF SCHREMS II FOR EU–US DATA FLOW

Abstract: With the constant flow of data across jurisdictions, issues regarding conflicting laws and the protection of rights arise. This article considers the EU–US data transfer relationship in the aftermath of the decision in Data Protection Commissioner v Facebook Ireland and Maximillian Schrems where the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) invalidated an EU–US data transfer agreement for the second time in just five years. This judgment continues the line of cases emphasising the high value the Court plac… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 6 publications
(4 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…56-63), or M.H. Murphy (2021) for analyses of the two so-called Schrems decisions on transatlantic data flows. There is also a new transatlantic data pact solution in the making, but it is too early to speculate about its legal, political, and other implications; see Manancourt (2022) for the recent political events.…”
Section: Challenges Controversies and Responsesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…56-63), or M.H. Murphy (2021) for analyses of the two so-called Schrems decisions on transatlantic data flows. There is also a new transatlantic data pact solution in the making, but it is too early to speculate about its legal, political, and other implications; see Manancourt (2022) for the recent political events.…”
Section: Challenges Controversies and Responsesmentioning
confidence: 99%