Plants and UV-B 1997
DOI: 10.1017/cbo9780511752346.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing the impact of UV-B radiation on the growth and yield of field crops

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

4
26
0
1

Year Published

1998
1998
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
4
26
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In particular, due to filtering by cellulose diacetate films the contribution of UV-B decreases in relation to UV-A. These aspects are often neglected in the design of experiments and have been critically discussed by several authors Teramura 1993b, 1994;Newsham et al 1996;Corlett et al 1997;Holmes 2002;White and Jahnke 2002).…”
Section: Uv Irradiationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, due to filtering by cellulose diacetate films the contribution of UV-B decreases in relation to UV-A. These aspects are often neglected in the design of experiments and have been critically discussed by several authors Teramura 1993b, 1994;Newsham et al 1996;Corlett et al 1997;Holmes 2002;White and Jahnke 2002).…”
Section: Uv Irradiationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The majority of evidence indicates that UV-B radiation usually triggers inhibitory effects among species and cultivars, yet not all plant responses are damaging or disadvantageous (Teramura and Murali 1986;Mohammed and Tarpley 2009). It has been reported that supraoptimal UV-B doses might inhibit plant growth (Sullivan and Teramura 1989;Mohammed and Tarpley 2009), biomass production (Tosserams et al 2001;Tsukaguchi and Iida 2008), crop yield (Teramura and Sullivan 1991;Corlett et al 1997;Tsukaguchi and Iida 2008;Mohammed and Tarpley 2009), photosynthetic pigments (Musil et al 2002;Balakrishnan et al 2005) and capacity (Ilwanzik et al 1983;Hidema et al 1991;Teramura and Sullivan 1994). Yet, in contrast to the majority reports on Chl reduction following UV-B treatment, Battag and Brennan (2000) showed that the concentrations of Chl a and b in cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) were not affected by UV-B treatment, while Musil et al (2002) reported an increase in Chl concentration for three South African plant species following UV-B exposure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…UVB radiation can adversely affect plant growth and development (Day and Neale 2002), the degree of damage varying with species (Kakani et al 2003b;Coleman and Day 2004) and cultivar (Corlett et al 1997;Papadopoulos et al 1999). Over the last two decades, the effects of UVB radiation on plant growth and physiological processes have been studied in a variety of crops and the results were, for the most part, deleterious (Biggs et al 1981;Dai et al 1994;Alenius et al 1995;Saile-Mark and Tevini 1997;Zavala and Botto 2002;Gitz et al 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%