2020
DOI: 10.1029/2020jc016580
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing the Impact of Nontraditional Ocean Observations for Prediction of the East Australian Current

Abstract: • The relative merits and trade-offs of diverse observational data streams on ocean state estimation and forecasting are assessed using two high-resolution reanalysis products of the East Australian Current (EAC) system • A reanalysis product that assimilates all available observations better represents the ocean state compared to one that assimilates traditionally available observations only. In particular, submesoscale surface vorticity and mesoscale eddies are effectively constrained through assimilation of… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

4
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
(118 reference statements)
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This data assimilating configuration has also been used in previous studies (e.g. Kerry et al, 2016;Kerry et al, 2018;Siripatana et al, 2020) including for OSSEs (Gwyther et al, 2022;Gwyther et al, 2023). The lateral forcing conditions are from BRAN2020, while atmospheric conditions are sourced from the Australian Bureau of Meteorology's ACCESS reanalysis (Puri et al, 2013).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This data assimilating configuration has also been used in previous studies (e.g. Kerry et al, 2016;Kerry et al, 2018;Siripatana et al, 2020) including for OSSEs (Gwyther et al, 2022;Gwyther et al, 2023). The lateral forcing conditions are from BRAN2020, while atmospheric conditions are sourced from the Australian Bureau of Meteorology's ACCESS reanalysis (Puri et al, 2013).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, hindcast reanalyses with a research focus (e.g. Kerry et al, 2016;Siripatana et al, 2020), can augment these traditional observation types with more novel, often delayedmode observations, e.g. high frequency radar-inferred surface currents, hydrography from autonomous gliders, and measurements from subsurface moorings.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, we focus on two manifestations of this impact: firstly how the model represents the instability that generates eddies and secondly the cascade of energy through the vertical (baroclinic) modes (e.g. Smith and Vallis, 2001). In Sect.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The 4-dimensional variational data assimilation (4D-Var) method reduces model errors over a finite time interval using all observations available while preserving dynamical consistency. 4D-Var has notable applications in oceanography, such as: Weaver et al (2003); Powell et al (2008); Mazloff et al (2010); Matthews et al (2012); Zavala-Garay et al (2012); de Souza et al (2015); Osafune et al (2015); Kerry et al (2016); Powell (2017); Phillipson and Toumi (2017); ; Janeković et al (2020); Siripatana et al (2020); Levin et al (2020); López et al (2020); de Paula et al (2021); Moore et al (2021)). Some of those are realistic 4D-Var applications using the Regional Ocean Modelling system (ROMS), from which different values of time-window length, observational errors, and decorrelation length scales were used for the tests presented in the current study.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…stated that assimilation of temperature and salinity from ocean gliders should be accompanied by surface measurements to prevent the generation of unrealistic instabilities. Siripatana et al (2020) compared two reanalysis: (i) assimilated traditional observations only (satellite SSH and SST, and temperature and salinity from Argo floats) and (ii) assimilated traditional observations and data from moorings, gliders and high-frequency radar; and found improved subsurface results in the latter experiment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%