2016
DOI: 10.7166/27-2-1144
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing the Impact of New Technology on Complex Sociotechnical Systems

Abstract: In complex sociotechnical systems, cognitive and social humans use technology to make sense of situations when making decisions. These elements make sociotechnical systems difficult to develop. A modelling and assessment methodology for systems engineering is required to understand the sociotechnical system's behaviour and underlying structure. Modelling captures the dynamic interaction, as well as the effect of humans in a complex environment. Cognitive Work Analysis and System Dynamics are two complementary … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
35
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
(48 reference statements)
0
35
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This is in line with Martinez-Moyano and Richardson [20], and Sterman [12]. Using a combination of existing literature, mental models of contemporary clients' and engineering consultant's project managers, and System Dynamics' Systems Thinking tools in the formulation of the dynamic hypotheses and System Dynamics conceptual model helps to strengthen their validity, as recommended by Barlas [30], Luna-Reyes and Andersen [23], Martinez-Moyano and Richardson [20], Sterman [12], and Oosthuizen [31].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…This is in line with Martinez-Moyano and Richardson [20], and Sterman [12]. Using a combination of existing literature, mental models of contemporary clients' and engineering consultant's project managers, and System Dynamics' Systems Thinking tools in the formulation of the dynamic hypotheses and System Dynamics conceptual model helps to strengthen their validity, as recommended by Barlas [30], Luna-Reyes and Andersen [23], Martinez-Moyano and Richardson [20], Sterman [12], and Oosthuizen [31].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Regardless of the complexity of organisations as complex technical and social systems, the STS theory provides a robust framework for analysis (Troyer, 2017). Oosthuizen and Pretorius (2016) agree that the STS theory can provide a good framework for modelling organisations as complex systems. Bostrom and Heinen (1977) argue that, on the one hand, the social dimension consists of: organisational structure; and actors (including people). …”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…In this regard, improving one dimension of a socio-technical system requires an improvement of the other for maintaining the best performance (Trist, 1981). As previously alluded to, this is called joint optimisation (Bostrom and Heinen, 1977; Appelbaum, 1997; Walker et al , 2007; Carayon et al , 2015; Oosthuizen and Pretorius, 2016). Joint optimisation is the cornerstone and foundation of the socio-technical systems theory (Chen and Redar, 2014).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…People Tasks Figure 1: Socio-technical system (Bostrom & Heinen, 1977a) STS has been used to model and explain complex work systems (Oosthuizen & Pretorius, 2016). An issue identified in the application of STS theory in IS is the lack of clear definitions of the components of the system (Alter, 2015).…”
Section: Structure Technologymentioning
confidence: 99%