Assessing the impact of knowledge and perceived economic benefits on sustainable consumption through the sharing economy: A sociotechnical approach

Managing the effectiveness of e-commerce platforms in a pandemic

“…Second, during pandemic periods, consumers are increasingly concerned more about engaging in sustainable consumption through e-commerce platforms as the findings signify economic benefits influence sustainable consumption. These findings are consistent with Dabbous and Tarhini (2019) who suggest that economic benefits influence consumer sustainable consumption intention. Thus, the current study, through the lens of UGT, offers a new theoretical view of the relationship among PEEP, economic benefits, and sustainable consumption.…”

“…First, measures of PEEP were adopted from Fang et al (2014) . Second, economic benefits and sustainable consumption were measured using the scales developed by Dabbous and Tarhini (2019) . Finally, pandemic fear was operationalized on the basis of Chatterjee et al (2019) .…”

“…Furthermore, the issue of economic benefits facilitating consumer sustainable consumption intention has been explicitly addressed in the literature ( Dabbous and Tarhini, 2019 ). The rationale behind this is that consumers perceived economic well-being, a comparison of current situation to a past situation when make a purchasing decision ( Verma and Sinha, 2018 ).…”

“…The rationale behind this is that consumers perceived economic well-being, a comparison of current situation to a past situation when make a purchasing decision ( Verma and Sinha, 2018 ). Some researchers consider economic benefits to be as important as product attributes when exploring online purchase intention ( Lee et al, 2018 ), while others consider it to be a driver of sustainable consumption ( Dabbous and Tarhini, 2019 ). This relationship is often based on a consumer responsibility, e.g., social, environmental, and ethical concerns ( Lim, 2017 ), or emotional responsibility ( Luchs et al, 2015 ).…”

Women as Key Agents in Sustainable Entrepreneurship: A Gender Multigroup Analysis of the SEO-Performance Relationship

“…Thus, confronted with this traditional, Western neoclassical economic perspective that underlies most interpretations of sustainable development and prevents the authentic achievement of social and environmental objectives, some authors proposed new perspectives to overcome the barriers imposed by neoclassical economics to ensure the principle of fair subsistence, both for the natural environment and for each individual and society as a whole [56]. The concept of sustainable sufficiency takes up these postulates from ecofeminist, ecocentric, or Buddhist perspectives, among others, focusing on unsustainable consumption patterns [66] within a society obsessed with maximizing short-term economic growth while ignoring the limits imposed by the finite nature of natural resources [67]. In this sense, the framework for sustainable sufficiency is related to the dematerialization of the economy; that is, with the reduction of the use of materials in production and consumption, creating products and services that, with a considerably lower environmental impact, provide consumers with the same level of performance and, at the same time, contribute to social welfare [56].…”