2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.fishres.2010.12.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing the impact of artisanal and recreational fishing and protection on a white seabream (Diplodus sargus sargus) population in the north-western Mediterranean Sea, using a simulation model. Part 2: Sensitivity analysis and management measures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A reserve effect reveals itself through an increase in (1) global species richness, (2) density, particularly that of species targeted by fishing (professional and recreational), and (3) frequency of large individuals compared to outside of the reserve (e.g. Alcala & Russ 1990, Francour 1994, Harmelin et al 1995, Vacchi et al 1998, Mosquera et al 2000, García-Charton et al 2004, Hussein et al 2011, Sahyoun et al 2013.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A reserve effect reveals itself through an increase in (1) global species richness, (2) density, particularly that of species targeted by fishing (professional and recreational), and (3) frequency of large individuals compared to outside of the reserve (e.g. Alcala & Russ 1990, Francour 1994, Harmelin et al 1995, Vacchi et al 1998, Mosquera et al 2000, García-Charton et al 2004, Hussein et al 2011, Sahyoun et al 2013.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These findings are consistent with earlier modelling studies (e.g., Pelletier and Magal 1996;Horwood et al 1998;Drouineau et al 2006;Dunlop et al 2009). In general, spawning MPAs were found to have limited effects (Grüss 2012), no positive effect (Hussein et al 2011) or negative effects (Edwards and Plaganyi 2011) on the SSB of temperate migratory fish populations, essentially due to fishing effort redistribution on juveniles. Furthermore, spawning MPAs did not produce fisheries benefits (Edwards and Plaganyi 2011;Hussein et al 2011;Grüss 2012).…”
Section: Targeted Mpas In Temperate Regionsmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…In general, spawning MPAs were found to have limited effects (Grüss 2012), no positive effect (Hussein et al 2011) or negative effects (Edwards and Plaganyi 2011) on the SSB of temperate migratory fish populations, essentially due to fishing effort redistribution on juveniles. Furthermore, spawning MPAs did not produce fisheries benefits (Edwards and Plaganyi 2011;Hussein et al 2011;Grüss 2012). Miethe et al (2011) also showed that spawning area closures do not affect fisheries-induced evolution in maturation size, because they create a stage-dependent mortality pattern favouring the catch of mature fishes migrating to spawning areas over immature fishes staying behind.…”
Section: Targeted Mpas In Temperate Regionsmentioning
confidence: 88%
See 2 more Smart Citations