2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102493
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing the flood risk to evacuees in outdoor built environments and relative risk reduction strategies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Strategies oriented towards the users take into account the response to the disaster conditions in the flood-affected BE, and so they are mainly devoted to the immediate emergency response (including the evacuation) and the immediate aftermath (including evacuation sheltering) [16,[85][86][87]. These strategies include both structural and non-structural measures for increasing the safety of users who can be initially exposed to the flood (e.g., because of their localization in the BE) and who can encounter potential threats over time (e.g., because they can move through or towards flood-affected areas).…”
Section: Strategies Users Orientedmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Strategies oriented towards the users take into account the response to the disaster conditions in the flood-affected BE, and so they are mainly devoted to the immediate emergency response (including the evacuation) and the immediate aftermath (including evacuation sheltering) [16,[85][86][87]. These strategies include both structural and non-structural measures for increasing the safety of users who can be initially exposed to the flood (e.g., because of their localization in the BE) and who can encounter potential threats over time (e.g., because they can move through or towards flood-affected areas).…”
Section: Strategies Users Orientedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These strategies include both structural and non-structural measures for increasing the safety of users who can be initially exposed to the flood (e.g., because of their localization in the BE) and who can encounter potential threats over time (e.g., because they can move through or towards flood-affected areas). At the same time, they should be founded on the users' behavioral interactions with the surrounding BE and the flood effects on it, which change depending on the emergency management system, as well as on the users' individual features (e.g., motion abilities, age, gender, familiarity with the BE, risk perception) and the relationships with the surrounding users (including those in the same group/family) [85,88,89]. As for other kinds of disasters affecting the built environment [90,91], these behavioral interactions also vary over the emergency time, depending on three main phases [45]: pre-movement, that is before the evacuation starting; evacuation, which implies the users' motion towards a "safer" area; reaching a "safe" area and the immediate aftermath.…”
Section: Strategies Users Orientedmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In fact, the study of hazard and risk from landslides has been dealt with geomatic methods for several years and many countries (including most European countries) have equipped themselves with digital maps that grade the various risks involved (Vallelongo, 2020;Papathoma-Köhle et al, 2011). It is clear, however, that the new scenarios require the redesign and remapping of a whole series of risks including, for example, that of the potential movement of loose materials (Chen et al, 2011;Canovas et al, 2016;Bernardini et al 2021). One of the current advantages over a few years ago, when many of these mappings were performed, is the greater availability of open software and data that can significantly facilitate these operations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, the study of hazard and risk from landslides has been dealt with geomatic methods for several years and many countries (including most European countries) have equipped themselves with digital maps that grade the various risks involved (Vallelongo, 2020;Papathoma-Köhle et al, 2011). It is clear, however, that the new scenarios require the redesign and remapping of a whole series of risks including, for example, that of the potential movement of loose materials (Chen et al, 2011;Canovas et al, 2016;Bernardini et al 2021). One of the current advantages over a few years ago, when many of these mappings were performed, is the greater availability of open software and data that can significantly facilitate these operations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%