2010 Proceedings - Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium (RAMS) 2010
DOI: 10.1109/rams.2010.5448003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing the fire risk for a historic Hangar

Abstract: NASA Ames Research Center (ARC) is evaluating options of reuse of its historic Hangar 1. As a part of this evaluation, a qualitative fire risk assessment study was performed to evaluate the potential threat of combustion of the historic hangar. The study focused on the fire risk trade-off of either installing or not installing a Special Hazard Fire Suppression System in the Hangar 1 deck areas.The assessment methodology was useful in discussing the important issues among various groups within the Center. Once … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Others, such as the risk of inadvertent discharge of the HEF system, are a multiple of the risk of fire, according to the writings of Milke et al 2 Basic risk values are based on the writings of Fewtrell et al, 14 Frank et al, 15 Malm and Patterson, 16 and Datta and Morrison. 17 Recall that the performance-based design approach is based on the recommendations of the USAF Sundown Policy for Foam Fire Suppression Systems. 18 In the policy, the USAF makes the case that the risk of accidental foam discharges is too high, and the policy directs the USAF to discontinue the use of HEFs in most hangar installations.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Others, such as the risk of inadvertent discharge of the HEF system, are a multiple of the risk of fire, according to the writings of Milke et al 2 Basic risk values are based on the writings of Fewtrell et al, 14 Frank et al, 15 Malm and Patterson, 16 and Datta and Morrison. 17 Recall that the performance-based design approach is based on the recommendations of the USAF Sundown Policy for Foam Fire Suppression Systems. 18 In the policy, the USAF makes the case that the risk of accidental foam discharges is too high, and the policy directs the USAF to discontinue the use of HEFs in most hangar installations.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Others, such as the risk of inadvertent discharge of the HEF system, are a multiple of the risk of fire, according to the writings of Milke et al 2 Basic risk values are based on the writings of Fewtrell et al, 14 Frank et al, 15 Malm and Patterson, 16 and Datta and Morrison. 17…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%