2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.palaeo.2016.10.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing the fidelity of marine vertebrate microfossil δ18O signatures and their potential for palaeo-ecological and -climatic reconstructions

Abstract: Conodont biogenic apatite has become a preferred analytical target for oxygen isotope studies investigating ocean temperature and palaeoclimate changes in the Palaeozoic. Despite the growing application in geochemically-based palaeoenvironmental reconstructions, the paucity or absence of conodont fossils in certain facies necessitates greater flexibility in selection of robust oxygen-bearing compounds for analysis. Vertebrate microfossils (teeth, dermal denticles, spines) offer a potential substitute for conod… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 133 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In fact, there are previous Rare Earth Elements analyses [ 40 , 63 – 65 ] as well as taphonomic evidence [ 38 , 39 ] for almost all the teeth included in this analysis supporting the lack of diagenetic processes (see [ 66 ] for a detailed review on the applicability of REE analysis as a tool for detecting diagenetic processes). Moreover, Žigaitė and Whitehouse [ 67 ] have recently studied the isotopic composition of different tooth tissues in extant sharks demonstrating that enameloid shows less δ 18 O variation than dentine and recommended it as a target biomineral and as a preferential biogeochemical reference for environmental and paleoenvironmental studies (see also [ 68 ]). Secondly, δ 18 O differences between teeth of co-occurring individuals can also reflect differences in water column temperature due to distinct water depth preferences [ 40 , 69 , 70 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, there are previous Rare Earth Elements analyses [ 40 , 63 – 65 ] as well as taphonomic evidence [ 38 , 39 ] for almost all the teeth included in this analysis supporting the lack of diagenetic processes (see [ 66 ] for a detailed review on the applicability of REE analysis as a tool for detecting diagenetic processes). Moreover, Žigaitė and Whitehouse [ 67 ] have recently studied the isotopic composition of different tooth tissues in extant sharks demonstrating that enameloid shows less δ 18 O variation than dentine and recommended it as a target biomineral and as a preferential biogeochemical reference for environmental and paleoenvironmental studies (see also [ 68 ]). Secondly, δ 18 O differences between teeth of co-occurring individuals can also reflect differences in water column temperature due to distinct water depth preferences [ 40 , 69 , 70 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The analytical method used in IGGCAS is similar to the descriptions in Li et al () and Tang et al (), except that a ~ 133 transfer magnification was employed to increase secondary ion transmission. The measurement conducted in GIGCAS and UWA followed the method described by Yang et al () and Roelofs et al (). The instrument configurations in the three SIMS laboratories were similar.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, Sr isotope measurements of the enameloid layer give Sr ages that are more reliable than observed for dentine (Becker et al, 2008;Tütken et al, 2020). This is due to the resistance of enameloid to diagenetic processes and weathering (Roelofs et al, 2017), similar to the enamel of mammalian teeth (Ayliffe et al, 1994;Kohn et al, 1999;Zazzo et al, 2004;Tütken et al, 2008). Dentine is therefore more prone to recrystallize during diagenesis than enameloid and other hypermineralized tissues that are J o u r n a l P r e -p r o o f more resistant to diagenetic alteration (Roelofs et al, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is due to the resistance of enameloid to diagenetic processes and weathering (Roelofs et al, 2017), similar to the enamel of mammalian teeth (Ayliffe et al, 1994;Kohn et al, 1999;Zazzo et al, 2004;Tütken et al, 2008). Dentine is therefore more prone to recrystallize during diagenesis than enameloid and other hypermineralized tissues that are J o u r n a l P r e -p r o o f more resistant to diagenetic alteration (Roelofs et al, 2017). However, it must be pointed out that the application of SIS on shark teeth from the Cenozoic successions comports some limitations as concerns the Paleogene, due to the oscillation and flattening of the calibration curve in correspondence of this system/period (McArthur et al, 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%