2022
DOI: 10.1177/15345084221095440
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing the Factor Structure and Measurement Invariance of the BASC-3 Behavioral and Emotional Screening System Student Form Across Race/Ethnicity and Gender

Abstract: The BASC-3 Behavioral and Emotional Screening System Student Form (BESS SF) is the latest iteration of a widely used instrument for identifying students at behavioral and emotional risk. Measurement invariance across race/ethnicity and gender for the latest BESS SF has not yet been established. Using a sample of 737 urban fourth- to eighth-grade students, we tested competing models of the BESS SF to determine the best-fitting factor structure. We also tested for measurement equivalence by race/ethnicity (i.e.,… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 29 publications
(44 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A detailed overview of social and emotional behavioral risk screeners is beyond the scope of this article. However, detailed summaries of these measures can be found in the primary sources (Basting et al, 2022; Houri & Miller, 2020; Jenkins et al, 2014) as well as a general overview of best practices in Behavioral, Social, and Emotional Assessment of Children and Adolescents (Whitcomb, 2018). Understanding the potential ramifications of their misapplication and the misinterpretation of their results is relevant to the issue of overidentification of CoC as having an EBD.…”
Section: Assessment: Social Emotional and Behavior Screenersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A detailed overview of social and emotional behavioral risk screeners is beyond the scope of this article. However, detailed summaries of these measures can be found in the primary sources (Basting et al, 2022; Houri & Miller, 2020; Jenkins et al, 2014) as well as a general overview of best practices in Behavioral, Social, and Emotional Assessment of Children and Adolescents (Whitcomb, 2018). Understanding the potential ramifications of their misapplication and the misinterpretation of their results is relevant to the issue of overidentification of CoC as having an EBD.…”
Section: Assessment: Social Emotional and Behavior Screenersmentioning
confidence: 99%