2018
DOI: 10.1080/00223891.2017.1406362
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing the Evaluative Content of Personality Questionnaires Using Bifactor Models

Abstract: Exploratory bifactor models with keying factors were applied to item response data for the NEO-FFI-3 and HEXACO-PI-R questionnaires. Loadings on a general factor and positive and negative keying factors correlated with independent estimates of item valence, suggesting that item valence influences responses to these questionnaires. Correlations between personality domain scores and measures of self-esteem, depression, and positive and negative affect were all reduced significantly when the influence of evaluati… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
21
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
1
21
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We do, however, disagree with the authors' assertion that "no candidate set of seven or more factors has yet been identified" (p. 11) as a meaningful improvement over the six factors of the HEXACO model. Specifically, we feel that the evaluative factor investigated by Biderman and colleagues (Biderman, McAbee, Chen, & Hendy, 2018;Biderman, McAbee, Hendy, & Chen, 2019) represents an important addition to the HEXACO model (and Big Five) as presented in the focal article. Ashton and Lee (2020a) argued against adding a seventh factor, stating that adding such a factor does not provide more information concerning variance accounted for above and beyond the existing six factors.…”
Section: Universalitymentioning
confidence: 96%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…We do, however, disagree with the authors' assertion that "no candidate set of seven or more factors has yet been identified" (p. 11) as a meaningful improvement over the six factors of the HEXACO model. Specifically, we feel that the evaluative factor investigated by Biderman and colleagues (Biderman, McAbee, Chen, & Hendy, 2018;Biderman, McAbee, Hendy, & Chen, 2019) represents an important addition to the HEXACO model (and Big Five) as presented in the focal article. Ashton and Lee (2020a) argued against adding a seventh factor, stating that adding such a factor does not provide more information concerning variance accounted for above and beyond the existing six factors.…”
Section: Universalitymentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Reise, 2012)particularly those estimated using exploratory structural equation modeling (ESEM) procedures (see, e.g. Asparouhov & Muthén, 2009;Marsh et al, 2010;Morin, Arens, & Marsh, 2016)-more appropriately represent the collection of traits that influence responses to personality questionnaires (Biderman et al, 2018(Biderman et al, , 2019.…”
Section: Universalitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Model bifaktor sebenarnya bukan gagasan baru, namun popularitasnya di kalangan peneliti sosial mulai meningkat dalam beberapa tahun terakhir. Model bifaktor sudah diterapkan pada pengukuran di bidang kesehatan mental (Brouwer & Meijer, 2013;Lahey et al, 2018), kepribadian (Biderman et al, 2018), dan pendidikan (Scherer & Gustafsson, 2015;Wang, Kim, Dedrick, Ferron, & Tan, 2018). Sebagai pengantar, Modul 1 membahas model bifaktor secara konseptual.…”
Section: Pengantarunclassified