1990
DOI: 10.1016/0261-5177(90)90026-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing the environmental impact of tourism development

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

2
31
0
1

Year Published

1996
1996
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 100 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
2
31
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…TEIA is an effectively method to analysis the effect of tourism on ecological environments by mathematical statistical analysis methods form microscopic view, which construct assessment index system and select assessment model based on environmental background to monitoring the feedback mechanism for impact of tourism environmental. However, it's usually ignoring the effectiveness of monitoring and feedback mechanism [105,106]. EFT constructs the tourism ecological footprint according to various data of per capita consumption by bottom-up questionnaire and investigates statistics.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…TEIA is an effectively method to analysis the effect of tourism on ecological environments by mathematical statistical analysis methods form microscopic view, which construct assessment index system and select assessment model based on environmental background to monitoring the feedback mechanism for impact of tourism environmental. However, it's usually ignoring the effectiveness of monitoring and feedback mechanism [105,106]. EFT constructs the tourism ecological footprint according to various data of per capita consumption by bottom-up questionnaire and investigates statistics.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus they have presented the results of the measurement of the impacts of tourism on the economy (Fletcher, 1989;Henderson, 1975;IUOTO, 1976;Liu and Var, 1983;McCann, 1983;Seward and Spinard, 1982;Witt, 1987), the environment (Agarwal and Biswas, 1989;Andriotis, 2003a;Green and Hunter, 1993;Holder, 1988;Jackson, 1984), society (Andriotis, 2004;Dogan, 1989;Haukeland, 1984;Mathieson and Wall, 1982;Milman and Pizam, 1988), and culture (Dogan, 1989;Greenwood, 1978;Richards, 1996;1999;Travis, 1982;UNESCO, 1976). These case studies may not situate themselves within any tourism development framework/theory but they will have theoretical underpinnings such as, for example, the economic concepts underlying economic impact studies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The recommended size of panels varies in the literature, with Delbecq et al (1975) contending that 10 to 15 respondents can be sufficient, while other studies use much larger panel sizes, from 40 participants (Green & Hunter, 1992) to over 70 participants (Miller, 2001). The choice of panel size ultimately depends on the aims of the research, namely, whether the research seeks to gain a representative range of opinions or, as in the case of the Tapestry TFP evaluation, selected input from key stakeholders.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At some stage (preferably after the initial compendium of responses is compiled), the items might be grouped into common themes in order to clarify the responses and remove redundancy -a procedure similar to content analysis (Krippendorf, 1980). The use of Delphi advisory panels in tourism research is quite common (Kaynak et al, 1994;Moeller & Shafer, 1987;Moutinho and Witt, 1995;Tideswell et al, 2001;Weber & Ladkin, 2003), and is particularly seen to be valuable when the views of key experts are to be canvassed (Green & Hunter, 1992). Miller (2001) employed the Delphi method to develop a set of indicators to measure sustainable development.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%