2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.psep.2023.03.061
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing the environmental footprint of plastic pyrolysis and gasification: A life cycle inventory study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As a result, WPO performed best in all three impact categories: human health, ecosystem quality, and resource scarcity. In another analysis by Xayachak et al, 249 the main driving factor of the environmental impacts for chemical recycling was reported to be the energy consumption required to achieve the required reaction temperature. Specifically, for the production of high-value chemical production from pyrolysis, electricity consumption was the primary contributor to the life cycle impacts in the categories of CC, terrestrial acidification, marine eutrophication, and TE.…”
Section: ■ Economic and Environmental Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result, WPO performed best in all three impact categories: human health, ecosystem quality, and resource scarcity. In another analysis by Xayachak et al, 249 the main driving factor of the environmental impacts for chemical recycling was reported to be the energy consumption required to achieve the required reaction temperature. Specifically, for the production of high-value chemical production from pyrolysis, electricity consumption was the primary contributor to the life cycle impacts in the categories of CC, terrestrial acidification, marine eutrophication, and TE.…”
Section: ■ Economic and Environmental Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As thermo‐chemical recycling technologies advance, more life cycle assessments (LCAs) for various routes are becoming available. [ 55–57 ] If differentiated between pyrolysis and gasification, pyrolysis is often favoured over gasification, and a common finding is that any recycling process outperforms incineration. [ 55 ] However, the route presented here, from mixed plastic to new polymers, is often overlooked.…”
Section: Challenges and Opportunitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[ 55–57 ] If differentiated between pyrolysis and gasification, pyrolysis is often favoured over gasification, and a common finding is that any recycling process outperforms incineration. [ 55 ] However, the route presented here, from mixed plastic to new polymers, is often overlooked. This oversight may stem from gasification being analyzed primarily as a waste‐to‐energy application, [ 55,56 ] the emergence of the gasification technology pathway where the necessary cleaning and upgrading processes are still in the research and design phase, and the reliance on experimental studies based on single polymer streams or excluding specific feedstock.…”
Section: Challenges and Opportunitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, pyrolysis is extensively researched for its ability to achieve high yields by thermally degrading plastic waste at high temperatures in an oxygen-free environment . Nevertheless, a more energy-efficient pyrolysis process is required due to the considerable energy consumption …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…10 Nevertheless, a more energy-efficient pyrolysis process is required due to the considerable energy consumption. 13 Polystyrene (PS), formed through the polymerization of styrene monomers (SM), is a versatile plastic renowned for its high strength, often employed alongside materials such as polyethylene, polypropylene, and polyvinyl chloride. 14,15 However, the recycling rate of PS significantly lags behind other plastics due to low profitability concerns.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%