2019
DOI: 10.1039/c9ee02939g
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing the energy offset at the electron donor/acceptor interface in organic solar cells through radiative efficiency measurements

Abstract: The radiative efficiency of non-fullerene devices is modulated by the energy offset, making electroluminescence a powerful tool for energy offset evaluation.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
59
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
59
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The optimal PM6:Y6 binary device exhibits a V oc of 0.84 V, a J sc of 24.25 mA cm −2 , and an FF of 0.795, yielding a PCE of 16.19%, in line with previous report. [11,26] By contrast, the binary device based on DRTB-T-C4:Y6 has a poor PCE of 4.14% with a V oc of 0.90 V, a J sc of 10.93 mA cm −2 , and an FF of 0.42. When increasing the content of DRTB-T-C4 by 10% (in donors w/w) into the host PM6:Y6 blend, the resulting ternary device produces the PCE of 17.13%, accompanied with a V oc of 0.85 V, a J sc of 24.79 mA cm −2 , and an FF of 0.813, which is one of the best efficiencies for the ternary OSCs reported to date.…”
Section: Doi: 101002/adma202002344mentioning
confidence: 98%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The optimal PM6:Y6 binary device exhibits a V oc of 0.84 V, a J sc of 24.25 mA cm −2 , and an FF of 0.795, yielding a PCE of 16.19%, in line with previous report. [11,26] By contrast, the binary device based on DRTB-T-C4:Y6 has a poor PCE of 4.14% with a V oc of 0.90 V, a J sc of 10.93 mA cm −2 , and an FF of 0.42. When increasing the content of DRTB-T-C4 by 10% (in donors w/w) into the host PM6:Y6 blend, the resulting ternary device produces the PCE of 17.13%, accompanied with a V oc of 0.85 V, a J sc of 24.79 mA cm −2 , and an FF of 0.813, which is one of the best efficiencies for the ternary OSCs reported to date.…”
Section: Doi: 101002/adma202002344mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…[20,21] Blend morphologies that possess fine phase separation and molecular packing can create highly effective charge transfer networks in the ternary system, resulting in improved charge transport and thus high device FF. [11,[22][23][24] Ternary architecture is one of the most effective strategies to boost the power conversion efficiency (PCE) of organic solar cells (OSCs). Here, an OSC with a ternary architecture featuring a highly crystalline molecular donor DRTB-T-C4 as a third component to the host binary system consisting of a polymer donor PM6 and a nonfullerene acceptor Y6 is reported.…”
Section: Doi: 101002/adma202002344mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In addition, based on the Shockley-Queisser theory, the maximum theoretical PCE for BHJ OSCs has been predicted up to 30%. [60][61][62] Empirically, the ideal active layer with an ASC of 40% could be achievable so that a theoretical AFOM of 1.33 could be deduced. Currently, the average evaluation manifests that a proper low-SC acceptor component plays an important role in achieving a good costeffectiveness for organic photovoltaic application.…”
Section: Cost-effectiveness Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%