2017
DOI: 10.1007/s11258-016-0644-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing the efficiency and effectiveness of rangeland restoration in Namaqualand, South Africa

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The only paper mentioning actual costs paid for site preparation is Kimiti et al (2017) who record the prices of labor and materials to construct barriers used for rangeland restoration in Laikipia, Kenya, with costs ranging from USD 16/ha (barriers using branches and dung) to USD 244/ha (barriers using branches and nylon). The site preparation activities presented by Bourne et al (2017) and Phillips-Mao et al (2015) fall within a similar cost range (the most costly activity being "hydrology restoration" at USD 283/ha, Phillips-Mao et al 2015). Török et al (2011) report much higher costs, recording costs for community translocation ranging from USD 20,837/ha for shallow layer translocation in lowland heath/ acid grasslands in the United Kingdom to USD 4,172,462/ha for deep layer translocation in wet moorlands and grasslands in Germany.…”
Section: Literature Review Resultsmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The only paper mentioning actual costs paid for site preparation is Kimiti et al (2017) who record the prices of labor and materials to construct barriers used for rangeland restoration in Laikipia, Kenya, with costs ranging from USD 16/ha (barriers using branches and dung) to USD 244/ha (barriers using branches and nylon). The site preparation activities presented by Bourne et al (2017) and Phillips-Mao et al (2015) fall within a similar cost range (the most costly activity being "hydrology restoration" at USD 283/ha, Phillips-Mao et al 2015). Török et al (2011) report much higher costs, recording costs for community translocation ranging from USD 20,837/ha for shallow layer translocation in lowland heath/ acid grasslands in the United Kingdom to USD 4,172,462/ha for deep layer translocation in wet moorlands and grasslands in Germany.…”
Section: Literature Review Resultsmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Ranges of costed restoration activities mentioned in literature, sorted by restoration phase and cost per hectare. Reference codes in table: A,Phillips- Mao et al (2015); B,Strehlow et al (2017); C,Bourne et al (2017); D, Török et al (2011); E,Kimiti et al (2017); F,Sheley et al (2014). a substantial difference between the per hectare costs of sowing and planting with different labor requirements: USD 86/ha for labor to lay native hay mulch and USD 2,271/ ha to transplant native soil plugs.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are many studies on the responses of South African ecosystems to contemporary and future predicted climate change (e.g., [67][68][69][70][71]), but there is less understanding of how these responses affect the provision of different ecosystem services [72,73]. Likewise, many studies have examined ecosystem responses to land degradation (and its converse, restoration) in South Africa (e.g., [51,[74][75][76]). In addition, any possible changes in species composition or the success of individual species within these mapped ecosystems, such as by the spread of invasive species, are also not well known (e.g., [77,78]).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In their paper, Bourne et al (2017) detail the significant degradation of the highly diverse vegetation of South Africa's Succulent Karoo as a result of decades of heavy grazing and fodder production. By combining two case studies, (1) outcomes of a local-scale restoration trial and (2) a cost-benefit assessment of regional-scale restoration efforts, the authors identify opportunities and challenges that face restoration in South Africa.…”
Section: Africamentioning
confidence: 99%