2009
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)he.1943-5584.0000024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing the Effects of Historical Land Cover Changes on Runoff and Low Flows Using Remote Sensing and Hydrological Modeling

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A considerable reduction of both the peak runoff and the total runoff volumes resulted from intensified afforestation. Savary et al (2009) assessed the effects of historical LULC change on runoff and low flow using the Gestion Intégrée des Bassins versantsà l'aide d'un Système Informatisé (GIBSI) model in the Chaudiere River watershed, Canada. Simulations showed strong correlations between LULC changes and stream discharge at the outlet of the watershed, especially for the summer and fall seasons.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A considerable reduction of both the peak runoff and the total runoff volumes resulted from intensified afforestation. Savary et al (2009) assessed the effects of historical LULC change on runoff and low flow using the Gestion Intégrée des Bassins versantsà l'aide d'un Système Informatisé (GIBSI) model in the Chaudiere River watershed, Canada. Simulations showed strong correlations between LULC changes and stream discharge at the outlet of the watershed, especially for the summer and fall seasons.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, the fact that observed discharge data for this river segment (1971–2000) are prior to the land cover map used in this study (Beaulieu et al ., ) can lead to a certain degree of deviation between observed and simulated data (e.g. Savary et al ., ). Thus, the closer in time the simulations are with respect to the land cover map used, the greater is the improvement.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Normally, after vegetation is removed, the distribution of roots becomes shallower, the soil porosity (especially the non-capillary porosity) decreases and the soil moisture-holding capacity decreases. Legesse et al [11], Coe et al [12], Savary et al [13] and Schilling et al [14] have performed related studies regarding the changes in runoff under different land use conditions and have obtained similar results. These authors observed that ET is stronger from woodlands than from other types of land.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 79%