2020
DOI: 10.1109/te.2019.2957711
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing the Effectiveness of Using Fab Lab-Based Learning in Schools on K–12 Students’ Attitude Toward STEAM

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…e platform of this paper, university's public course information teaching platform based on SPOC and university's physics mobile learning platform based on Android are used to collect data and verify the accuracy of data collection results. e comparison platform is represented by the platform in [5]; the platform in [6], which is based on the analysis of the current situation of college physics teaching and the needs of students learning (a college-based physical mobile learning platform based on Android system is designed and developed in this paper, and it is also applied to the curriculum to be carried out in the teaching practice); the platform in [7], which is a type of Fab Lab-based learning system; and the platform in [8]. e data collection results of all platforms are shown in Table 2.…”
Section: Experimental Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…e platform of this paper, university's public course information teaching platform based on SPOC and university's physics mobile learning platform based on Android are used to collect data and verify the accuracy of data collection results. e comparison platform is represented by the platform in [5]; the platform in [6], which is based on the analysis of the current situation of college physics teaching and the needs of students learning (a college-based physical mobile learning platform based on Android system is designed and developed in this paper, and it is also applied to the curriculum to be carried out in the teaching practice); the platform in [7], which is a type of Fab Lab-based learning system; and the platform in [8]. e data collection results of all platforms are shown in Table 2.…”
Section: Experimental Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…e online tutoring teaching platform of college English can cultivate students' ability to acquire knowledge by using the network and promote the cultivation of students' independent spirit and cooperative quality. Recently, mobile learning has grown in popularity and complexity with the proliferation of mobile devices and online video services [7]. New challenges include the multitude of mobile devices with different characteristics and limitations and the exponential growth in educational multimedia content.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, peer evaluation results show that the blending learning method based on intelligent robots arouses students' enthusiasm and increases their investment in learning. For this reason, more and more research attempts have been shifting towards student-centric [23], so it is essential to establish an environment for creative learning and personalized student development [19].…”
Section: Project Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The free and pleasant atmosphere it creates encourages STEM education and enhances the learning process. Togou et al [19] used Fab Labs (Computer Manufacturing Labs) to prove that learners can be more interested in learning and quickly adapt to the new environment. Dasgupta et al [20] used an Energy3D (Educational Computer-Aided Tool) learning environment to provide formative feedback to help students understand knowledge.…”
Section: Research Statusmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This reveals that when integrating learning domains, it is significant to incorporate different tasks. Most studies reported mixed learning outcomes [31,64]. The more that STEM activity designers integrate the disciplines, the more likely they are to adopt different tasks and investigate different learning outcomes.…”
Section: Discussion Of Main Findingsmentioning
confidence: 99%