Assessing the effectiveness of protected areas for conserving range‐restricted rain forest butterflies in Sabah, Borneo

Abstract

Rain forests on Borneo support exceptional concentrations of endemic insect biodiversity, but many of these forest‐dependent species are threatened by land‐use change. Totally protected areas (TPAs) of forest are key for conserving biodiversity, and we examined the effectiveness of the current TPA network for conserving range‐restricted butterflies in Sabah (Malaysian Borneo). We found that mean diurnal temperature range and precipitation of the wettest quarter of the year were the most important predictors of butterfly distributions (N = 77 range‐restricted species), and that species richness increased with elevation and aboveground forest carbon. On average across all species, TPAs were effective at conserving ~43% of species’ ranges, but encompassed only ~40% of areas with high species richness (i.e., containing at least 50% of our study species). The TPA network also included only 33%–40% of areas identified as high priority for conserving range‐restricted species, as determined by a systematic conservation prioritization analysis. Hence, the current TPA network is reasonably effective at conserving range‐restricted butterflies, although considerable areas of high species richness (6,565 km2) and high conservation priority (11,152–12,531 km2) are not currently protected. Sabah's remaining forests, and the range‐restricted species they support, are under continued threat from agricultural expansion and urban development, and our study highlights important areas of rain forest that require enhanced protection. Abstract in Malay is available with online material.

Proximity to forest mediates trade‐offs between yields and biodiversity of birds in oil palm smallholdings

“…Hence, in those regions where large tracts of natural forest persist, biodiversity may be best supported by land‐sparing policies, provided that forest “spared” in this way is afforded genuine protection (Matson & Vitousek, 2006; Phalan, 2018). Land‐sharing practices can in turn provide important biodiversity benefits, including facilitating dispersal between tracts of forest (Tscharntke et al, 2012; Lucey et al, 2017), which may become increasingly important to allow tropical species to track changing climates (Scriven et al, 2020). Hence both strategies can play important roles in future agricultural development, and a mixture of strategies may also be more pragmatic (Carrasco et al, 2014; Finch et al, 2020; Fischer et al, 2008), especially given constraints on smallholders’ time and other resources required to farm more intensively (Lee et al, 2014).…”

Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR)-Assisted Detection of Rock Outcrops in Appalachian Hardwood Forests

“…Similarly, range-restricted species are frequently at risk of declines due to habitat loss and are therefore the target of many conservation management programs (Casazza et al 2014;Januchowski-Hartley 2016;Scriven et al 2020).…”

Systematic prioritization protocol applied to wolverine habitat connectivity

“…The prioritization protocol below describes the specific steps for prioritizing future wolverine connectivity on private land in western Montana. The prioritization methods have broad applications, including single-species, multi-species, and biodiversity questions ( Tack et al., 2019 ; Scriven et al., 2020 ; Delso et al., 2021 ; Hanson et al., 2021 ) and are not limited to terrestrial systems ( Pinsky et al., 2020 ; Magris et al., 2021 ). This protocol has resulted in an ongoing collaboration between managers and willing private landowners in Montana, which is unique given historical challenges in science-management-stakeholder partnerships.…”