Assessing the effectiveness of landslide slope stability by analysing structural mitigation measures and community risk perception

Abstract

Rainfall-induced landslides seriously threaten hilly environments, leading local authorities to implement various mitigation measures to decrease disaster risk. However, there is a significant gap in the current literature regarding evaluating their effectiveness and the associated community risk perception. To address this gap, we used an interdisciplinary and innovative approach to analyse the slope stability of landslides, evaluate the effectiveness of existing structural mitigation measures, and assess the risk perception of those living in danger zones. Our case study focused on the Kutupalong Rohingya Camp (KRC) in Cox’s Bazar, Bangladesh, which is home to over one million Rohingya refugees from Myanmar. Although various structural and non-structural countermeasures were implemented in the KRC to mitigate the impact of landslides, many of them failed to prevent landslides from occurring. We utilised a variety of methods from the physical sciences, including the infinite slope, limit equilibrium (LEM), and finite element (FEM) approaches, to calculate the factor of safety (FoS) for specific slopes. Additionally, in the social sciences domain, we conducted a questionnaire survey of approximately 400 Rohingya participants to assess the community’s perception of the interventions and the degree of disaster risk. Our findings indicated that slopes with a gradient greater than 40° were unstable (FoS < 1), which was present throughout the entire KRC area. The effectiveness of the LEM and FEM methods was evaluated for four dominant slope angles (40°, 45°, 50°, and 55°) under varying loads (0, 50, and 100 kN/m2). The slopes were found to be stable for lower slope angles but unstable for higher slope angles (> 50°) and increased overburden loads (50–100 kN/m2). Different mitigation measures were tested on the identified unstable slopes to assess their effectiveness, but the results showed that the countermeasures only provided marginal protection against landslides. Survey results revealed that at least 70% of respondents believed that concrete retaining walls are more effective in reducing landslide occurrence compared to other measures. Additionally, about 60% of the respondents questioned the reliability of the existing structural mitigation measures. The study also found that the cohesion and friction angle of lower sandstone and the cohesion of upper soil layers are important factors to consider when designing and implementing slope protection countermeasures in the KRC area.

A Comprehensive Approach to Quantitative Risk Assessment of Rockfalls on Buildings Using 3D Model of Rockfall Runout

“…Moreover, the integration of both physical and social science aspects in comprehending and evaluating landslide mitigation measures by community perception represents a groundbreaking approach. This entire perspective not only raises innovation but also raises public trust in the efficacy of such measures [66].…”

Stability analysis of rainfall-induced landslide considering air resistance delay effect and lateral seepage

“…In addition, satisfactory analysis (including artificial intelligence, etc.) of risk assessment constituted an active area of research in the field of slope stability and landslides 1 , 2 . And combining statistical analysis and physical modeling for risk assessment can better understand the conditions of landslide and slope stability in different environments.…”

Landslide Hazard Assessment Combined with InSAR Deformation: A Case Study in the Zagunao River Basin, Sichuan Province, Southwestern China

“…Geological-climatic models, using annual precipitation's characteristic values and terrain indices, estimate landslide occurrence frequencies, assessing landslide disaster risks with significant uncertainties [28]. With the increase in economic development and human activities, as well as the dilution of risk awareness and overreliance on different protective measures [29][30][31], areas with a moderate to high landslide risk are widespread. This leads to challenges for governments in effectively using and developing resources, as well as in categorizing previously controlled high-risk areas as moderate to high risk in landslide assessments.…”