2017
DOI: 10.1080/09524622.2017.1396498
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing the effect of sound file compression and background noise on measures of acoustic signal structure

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

2
41
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
2
41
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, we believe that the magnitude of this bias is not strong enough to compromise our comparisons since we expect larger spectral divergence between populations than the mean frequency measurement error of 86 Hz caused by lossy compression (Araya‐Salas et al . ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…However, we believe that the magnitude of this bias is not strong enough to compromise our comparisons since we expect larger spectral divergence between populations than the mean frequency measurement error of 86 Hz caused by lossy compression (Araya‐Salas et al . ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…We quantified 12 fine structural characteristics of the songs of Olive Sparrows that described the frequency and temporal traits of songs. We included four measurements based on the spectrum (Araya‐Salas and Smith‐Vidaurre , Sueur , Araya‐Salas et al ), including (1) mean frequency (the average of the frequencies in the signal weighted by their amplitude), (2) standard deviation of the mean frequency, (3) first quartile frequency (based on the power spectrum, the smallest discrete frequency in kHz where the summed energy under the frequency value has to exceed 25% of the total energy), and (4) third quartile frequency (based on the power spectrum, the smallest discrete frequency in kHz where the summed energy under the frequency value has to exceed 75% of the total energy).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Xeno‐canto provide recordings in mp3 format, which we converted into wav format using Audacity (Audacity Team ) as required for subsequent analyses. Compression to mp3 format does not appear to bias estimated parameters, but may affect the precision of certain measurements (Araya‐Salas et al ); however, by sampling across a wide range of taxa we hope to accommodate for any potential effect. We did not choose recordings based on sampling rate, bitrate, or number of mp3 channels.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We analyzed the recordings using a combination of approaches. First, we analyzed recordings in the statistical program R (R Core Team) using the package ‘warbleR’ (Araya‐Salas and Smith‐Vidaurre ), which allowed for efficient measuring of acoustic parameters, quantifying by default 29 different audio parameters. From these 29 parameters, we only retained those four which had previously been suggested to describe audio complexity: spectral entropy (complexity of the audio elements, Tchernichovski et al ), spectral flatness (distribution of energy across spectral bands, Tachibana et al ), modulation index (accumulated absolute difference between adjacent measurements of fundamental frequencies divided by the frequency range, Nottebohm ) and bandwidth (maximum – minimum frequency, Seddon et al ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%