2011
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2011.04923.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing the effect of different ultrasonic frequencies on bacterial viability using flow cytometry

Abstract: Aims:  This research investigated the effect of sonication at frequencies of 20, 40 and 580 kHz and approximately the same acoustic intensity on the viability and declumping of two micro‐organisms (Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumonia). Methods and Results:  Two analytical methods were employed; viable plate counts (CFU ml−1) and flow cytometry to identify and quantify both live/viable and dead bacteria in the bulk liquid. Flow cytometry results for E. coli and Kl. pneumonia indicated a high sensitivity t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
72
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 118 publications
(75 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
(52 reference statements)
3
72
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The maximum firmness was observed at 20/40 kHz, 40°C, and 2 min while the minimum value was observed at 20/60 kHz, 60°C, and 6 min. The losses of firmness of fruit during sonication have been reported by various authors and were attributed to tissue rupturing and cell wall degradation which lead to disturbances in the constituents of cell wall such as pectin methylesterase and polygalacturonates (Vicente, Saladié, Rose, & Labavitch, ; Vivek et al, ), and also due to the mechanical effects induced by pressure (Joyce, Al‐Hashimi, & Mason, ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The maximum firmness was observed at 20/40 kHz, 40°C, and 2 min while the minimum value was observed at 20/60 kHz, 60°C, and 6 min. The losses of firmness of fruit during sonication have been reported by various authors and were attributed to tissue rupturing and cell wall degradation which lead to disturbances in the constituents of cell wall such as pectin methylesterase and polygalacturonates (Vicente, Saladié, Rose, & Labavitch, ; Vivek et al, ), and also due to the mechanical effects induced by pressure (Joyce, Al‐Hashimi, & Mason, ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…At still lower power and frequencies of 0.5 – 0.8 MHz, ultrasound exposure did not inactivate the bacteria; coliform counts instead increased, apparently due to disaggregation of clusters by ultrasound exposure (Joyce et al . 2003; 2011). In other cases, the power requirements to achieve modest levels of inactivation can be extreme; e.g ., about 1.5 kW-hrs per liter treated (Drakapoulou et al .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Inactivation of microorganisms by ultrasound was first reported in the 1920s [8], and the specific mechanism began to be reported in the 1960s [9]. The inactivation mechanism differs with different parameters, such as temperature, ultrasonic frequency, and acoustic power, and between microorganisms; the inactivation mechanisms for ultrasonic inactivation of Escherichia coli [10], Listeria monocytogenes [11] and Alicyclobacillus acidiphilus [12] have been reported.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%