Assessing the effect of article processing charges on the geographic diversity of authors using Elsevier’s “Mirror Journal” system

Abstract

Journals publishing open access (OA) articles often require that authors pay article processing charges (APC). Researchers in the Global South often cite APCs as a major financial obstacle to OA publishing, especially in widely-recognized or prestigious outlets. Consequently, it has been hypothesized that authors from the Global South will be underrepresented in journals charging APCs. We tested this hypothesis using >37,000 articles from Elsevier’s ‘Mirror journal’ system, in which a hybrid ‘Parent’ journal and its Gold-OA ‘Mirror’ share editorial boards and standards for acceptance. Most articles were non-OA; 45% of articles had lead authors based in either the United States of America (USA) or China. After correcting for the effect of this dominance and differences in sample size, we found that OA articles published in Parent and Mirror journals had lead authors with similar Geographic Diversity. However, Author Geographic Diversity of OA articles was significantly lower than that of non-OA articles. Most OA articles were written by authors in high-income countries, and there were no articles in Mirror journals by authors in low-income countries. Our results for Elsevier’s Mirror-Parent system are consistent with the hypothesis that APCs are a barrier to OA publication for scientists from the Global South.

The potential of inclusive and collaborative Open Research processes at the science-policy interface

“…Ross-Hellauer 2022) of stratification of OA authorial patterns resulting from high Article Processing Charges (APCs). There is far less geographic diversity among authors publishing via APC-OA (Smith et al 2021), and they are more likely to be male, senior in their careers, beneficiaries of public funding, and employed at prestigious research institutions (Olejniczak and Wilson 2020). These trends manifest because authors that fit these demographic characteristics are better able to pay high APCs while authors from less-or under-resourced institutions cannot (Pourret et al…”

Editorial: Death and Mourning Processes in the Times of the Coronavirus Pandemic (COVID-19)

“…Beliefs regarding COVID-19 have changed and will certainly be investigated in future research. Furthermore, for the first time in the field of scientific dissemination, open access journals have allowed a gold model also leveling the gap present in this type of publication, compared to laboratories with a lot of funding and laboratories with little funding, a gap highlighted just recently ( 15 ). This has allowed raising our voices as one to express and analyze death and mourning processes from the five continents.…”

When I use a word . . . . Bioscience journals—an open and shut case?

“…The annotation was based on the results of a study of over 37 000 articles published in 38 journals and their corresponding mirror journals. 13 The study showed that "The overwhelming majority of articles [in Parent journals or the Gold OA Mirrors] had lead authors based in high-income countries. ... [A]uthors from middle-income countries published proportionately few OA articles, but authors in low-income countries published almost entirely subscription-only articles in Parent journals."…”