2018
DOI: 10.1086/697152
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing the Economic Benefits of Reductions in Marine Debris at Southern California Beaches: A Random Utility Travel Cost Model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
44
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
44
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Jang et al (2014) linked more than 20 million dollars lost revenue in 2011 (compared to 2010) due to increased litter on Goeje Island beaches. Leggett et al (2014) estimated that a 75% reduction of marine debris at six popular beaches of Orange County, California generated 40 million dollars benefit in just 3 months. Fisheries, shipping industries, navy, and aquaculture lose time and money by cleaning marine debris from their nets, ship propellers, cooling intakes, and farms.…”
Section: Economicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Jang et al (2014) linked more than 20 million dollars lost revenue in 2011 (compared to 2010) due to increased litter on Goeje Island beaches. Leggett et al (2014) estimated that a 75% reduction of marine debris at six popular beaches of Orange County, California generated 40 million dollars benefit in just 3 months. Fisheries, shipping industries, navy, and aquaculture lose time and money by cleaning marine debris from their nets, ship propellers, cooling intakes, and farms.…”
Section: Economicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The presence of litter, especially in tourist-heavy recreational areas, also has a negative economic impact in part because of its adverse aesthetics prompting some visitors to avoid littered beaches (Leggett et al, 2018). Based on an analysis of the economic impact of marine debris during the three-month prime beach season for 31 beaches in Orange County, CA, the economic benefits of a 25% reduction in marine debris were valued at $29.5 million with a per capita seasonal value of $12.91 (Leggett et al, 2018) Cleaning-up marine litter from the open ocean is not currently feasible as prevention is the only successful approach to manage the problem (Jambeck, 2015). In con-trast, cleaning up coastal and land-based litter is feasible, but can be a significant expense for a local government.…”
Section: Economic Impacts Of Plastic Littermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Researchers have even identified what commonplace debris items are expected to have the most significant, deleterious impacts on major marine taxa and where major marine taxa are at the most significant risk (Wilcox et al, 2016). Other work has evaluated the effectiveness of various policies on mismanaged waste Schuyler et al, in press;Willis et al, in press) visitors' response to local litter loads (Leggett et al, 2014) and the economic costs of marine debris pollution due to major weather events (Jang et al, 2014). Scientists have moved beyond providing evidence alone of the interactions between plastic and the environment, with the field having matured to address questions around what we know vs. what is believed (i.e., demonstrated evidence, opinions and public perception) (Rochman et al, 2015;.…”
Section: Using Science To Inform the "Plastic Tragedy"mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, after a heavy rainfall event which resulted in a significant increase in coastal debris loads in South Korea, revenue losses from tourism were estimated at $29-37M USD (Jang et al, 2014). In coastal California, visitors are reported to travel longer distances to avoid beaches with more waste (Leggett et al, 2014), and in Brazil, a recent survey reports that 85% of beachgoers will avoid beaches with high litter loads (>15 pieces per m 2 ) (Krelling et al, 2017). This is also interesting in light of numerous reports (and anecdotal evidence) that beachgoers themselves can be a contributing source of debris (Santos et al, 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%