Gene Flow From GM Plants 2005
DOI: 10.1002/9780470988497.ch6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing the Ecological Fitness of Recipients

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 78 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Models to predict ecological consequences of transgene movement from genetically modified (GM) crops to wild relatives require a measure of hybrid fitness (Hails & Morley 2005; Weis 2005). GM rapeseed ( Brassica napus 2n = 4x = 38) has cross‐compatible relatives over most of its global range (Raybould & Gray 1993; Scheffler & Dale 1994; Ellstrand et al .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Models to predict ecological consequences of transgene movement from genetically modified (GM) crops to wild relatives require a measure of hybrid fitness (Hails & Morley 2005; Weis 2005). GM rapeseed ( Brassica napus 2n = 4x = 38) has cross‐compatible relatives over most of its global range (Raybould & Gray 1993; Scheffler & Dale 1994; Ellstrand et al .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Usually, the low fertility of early-generation hybrids has been considered to be the major hindrance for introgression to take place (e.g. Weis, 2005). For instance, F 1 hybrids from certain crop–wild crosses of rice showed reduced fertility (Ellstrand et al , 1999).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Theoretical studies (Haygood et al 2004) revealed that even low hybridization rates (on the order of 10 −3 ) might allow for the rapid escape and establishment of a moderately favored transgene. Transgenes could have a significant ecological advantage if they increased the recipient's interspecific competitiveness, increased its ability to invade an expanded niche range, or precipitated a severe decline in herbivores or plant pathogens that limit its growth (Weis 2005). Not all such changes would necessarily promote weediness/invasiveness.…”
Section: Fecundity and Fitnessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Not all such changes would necessarily promote weediness/invasiveness. For example, a gene that increases interspecific competitive ability could induce a genetic sweep through the recipient population without changing its abundance and density relative to the larger community, although the genetic diversity and structure could be affected (Weis 2005). Thus, predictions on the implications of transgene spread require some knowledge of the demography and genetic structure of the recipient populations, how they interact with other species, and what factors limit their spread.…”
Section: Fecundity and Fitnessmentioning
confidence: 99%