1984
DOI: 10.6028/nbs.ir.84-2825
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing the credibility of the calorific value of municipal solid waste

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1986
1986
1986
1986

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
(7 reference statements)
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Two of the 2.5 kg samples from each group were milled to 2 mm particle size and then, to obtain gram-size test samples, each of these parent samples was subdivided using a rotary riffler rather than the usual method of coning and quartering. The results, which we believe resolve the processing and sampling questions, are discussed in detail elsewhere [5]. In brief, the results are as follows:…”
Section: Numbers In Brackets Indicate Literature Referencesmentioning
confidence: 59%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Two of the 2.5 kg samples from each group were milled to 2 mm particle size and then, to obtain gram-size test samples, each of these parent samples was subdivided using a rotary riffler rather than the usual method of coning and quartering. The results, which we believe resolve the processing and sampling questions, are discussed in detail elsewhere [5]. In brief, the results are as follows:…”
Section: Numbers In Brackets Indicate Literature Referencesmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…The pairs of samples designated as E and E' followed by the same number were prepared in such a way that each sample is "identical" (see reference [5]. p. [19][20][21][22]).…”
Section: Typical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations