2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.marpol.2019.103798
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing the Brazilian federal fisheries law and policy in light of the Voluntary Guidelines for Securing Sustainable Small-scale fisheries

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
(18 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…8) (UNGA Resolution 61/295). Moreover, at national level, a law can be passed to provide such compensation (Nakamura and Hazin, 2020). For example, Petrobras company in Brazil had to adopt a plan to compensate the impact of its activity towards small-scale fishers (Lei no.…”
Section: Ocean Grabbingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…8) (UNGA Resolution 61/295). Moreover, at national level, a law can be passed to provide such compensation (Nakamura and Hazin, 2020). For example, Petrobras company in Brazil had to adopt a plan to compensate the impact of its activity towards small-scale fishers (Lei no.…”
Section: Ocean Grabbingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…for decentralizing managerial responsibility for natural resources to communities that have a proven history of sustainable use" (Da Silva, 2004, p. 421). In fact, coastal and marine RESEX avoid green grabbing, since traditional populations are at the base of their constitution and management (Nakamura and Hazin, 2020).…”
Section: Ocean Grabbingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This transboundary problem repeats within national borders as well. In most tropical countries with large coastlines like Brazil, Indonesia, Philippines, India and Mexico, coastal fisheries are often decentralised and governed by provinces which have significant autonomy in terms of fisheries management [22][23][24][25]26 . Rarely is there a uniform harvest regime across the geographical area considered within a PSA.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is also, however, a data poor region in relation to fisheries statistics despite being the largest fish producing region (Santa Catarina state) in the country [20]. Stock monitoring data are regionally and chronologically dispersed [20][21][22][23], and mostly limited to the second half of the 20th and the first decade of the 21st centuries [20,[24][25][26][27]. In Brazil, there has been an increased effort to expand stock reconstructions with data collected from local fisheries [28][29][30][31][32][33] and seafood wholesale market data [34,35], but these approaches are inherently limited to only the most recent decades affected by large national fisheries subsidies, specifically from the 1960's to 1970's [36].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%