2000
DOI: 10.1080/00949650008812051
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing the bias of maximum likelihood estimates of contaminated garch models

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
15
0
2

Year Published

2006
2006
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
15
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, it is also important to notice that if the sample size is not very large, it is possible to obtain estimates that do not satisfy the usual non‐negativity restrictions (see, e.g. the simulation results in Mendes, 2000).…”
Section: Effects Of Outliers On the Estimation Of Arch Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Finally, it is also important to notice that if the sample size is not very large, it is possible to obtain estimates that do not satisfy the usual non‐negativity restrictions (see, e.g. the simulation results in Mendes, 2000).…”
Section: Effects Of Outliers On the Estimation Of Arch Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Muller and Yohai, 2002, who show that the mean squared error of the ML estimator of the parameters of ARCH(1) models is dramatically influenced by isolated outliers]. On the other hand, Mendes (2000) shows that the influence functional of the ML estimator of the parameters of an ARCH(1) model is the product of a constant vector by a quadratic function of the outlier size. Consider the simplest ARCH(1) model.…”
Section: Effects Of Outliers On the Estimation Of Arch Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…12 A possible explanation for these findings could be the presence of small patches of outliers in our sample. 13 It is well known that the estimates based on normal likelihood are very sensitive to the presence of few outliers in the sample [23,24]. In fact, authors like Muler and Yohai [24] have reminded us that a single huge outlier may have a very large effect on the QML estimates.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Outliers can affect identification and estimation of the GARCH-type models (Carnero et al, 2007 and 2012); they can wrongly suggest conditional heteroscedasticity or hide true heteroscedasticity (see e.g., Balke and Fomby, 1994;Dijk et al, 1999;Franses and Ghijsels, 1999;Aggarwal et al, 1999;Carnero et al, 2007); they can bias the GARCH parameters estimation (see e.g., Sakata and White, 1998;Mendes, 2000;Charles, 2008); and they can affect out-of-sample forecasts (see e.g., Franses and Ghijsels, 1999;Carnero et al, 2007;Charles, 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%