2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.tplants.2013.09.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing the bacterial contribution to the plastid proteome

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
47
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 78 publications
3
47
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, 7 trees were insufficiently sampled to allow any interpretation, and in 18 other trees the topology was compatible with a HGT but the closest sister group to Archaeplastida was not Chlamydiae but other bacterial groups. This later observation is in accordance with previous estimations of the composition of the protein repertoire of plastids [33][34][35]. Fig.…”
Section: Ménage à Troissupporting
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Moreover, 7 trees were insufficiently sampled to allow any interpretation, and in 18 other trees the topology was compatible with a HGT but the closest sister group to Archaeplastida was not Chlamydiae but other bacterial groups. This later observation is in accordance with previous estimations of the composition of the protein repertoire of plastids [33][34][35]. Fig.…”
Section: Ménage à Troissupporting
confidence: 93%
“…To have a more precise view on the H/EGT that specifically contributed to Archaeplastida genomes, an interesting yet limited strategy is to apply the same survey procedures to plastid proteomes (excluding plastid-encoded proteins). This analysis, conducted several times independently, led to comparable results where cyanobacteria were the main contributors to plastid proteomes, followed by proteobacteria and Chlamydiae, as well as many other bacterial phyla [33][34][35]. While we start to understand how EGT from the cyanobiont have physically happened [36], it is still difficult to determine the chronology of their (probably continuous) occurrence in the interval between the engulfment of the cyanobiont and the diversification of Archaeplastida.…”
Section: Genome Mosaicism In Archaeplastidamentioning
confidence: 98%
“…These putative common enzyme recruitments (or replacements) suggest that the common ancestor of the Archaeplastida enlisted proteins for plastid functions before the diversification of the three descendant lineages. Detailed phylogenetic surveys suggest that several of these proteins are products of genes acquired by the eukaryote host from diverse bacterial sources via HGT [30,31,91,92].…”
Section: Phylogenomics Of Cyanophora Paradoxamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, hundreds of plastid proteins encoded in the nuclear genome have to be imported into the photosynthetic organelle via the TOC/TIC machinery (Keegstra and Cline, 1999;Leister, 2003) (Figure 1A). Remarkably, only between 600 and 1700 of the plastid-localized proteins are of cyanobacterial provenance (Price et al, 2012;Dagan et al, 2013), and a considerable proportion of the organelle protein collection has been recruited from the host repertoire and diverse bacterial sources during plastid evolution (Suzuki and Miyagishima, 2010;Qiu et al, 2013;Schönknecht et al, 2014).…”
Section: The Plastid Proteome Is a Phylogenetic Mosaicmentioning
confidence: 99%