The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2009
DOI: 10.3763/cpol.2008.0533
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing the additionality of CDM projects: practical experiences and lessons learned

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
95
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 170 publications
(101 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
2
95
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast, renewable energy and energy-efficiency systems often deliver higher-cost reductions but also higher long-term value in terms of the ability for project replication, local pollution reduction, technology transfer and sustainable development outcomes (Ellis, Winkler et.al. 2007;Figueres 2006;Schneider 2009;Sutter and Parreño 2007). …”
Section: Carbon Emission Reductionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, renewable energy and energy-efficiency systems often deliver higher-cost reductions but also higher long-term value in terms of the ability for project replication, local pollution reduction, technology transfer and sustainable development outcomes (Ellis, Winkler et.al. 2007;Figueres 2006;Schneider 2009;Sutter and Parreño 2007). …”
Section: Carbon Emission Reductionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Project developers currently use a variety of approaches for demonstrating additionality, which are discussed and evaluated by Schneider (2009 The information used for barrier analyses are usually highly subjective, vague, and difficult to validate.…”
Section: Improving Environmental Quality Outcomesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to its design as a project-based mechanism, some have also seen the CDM as fundamentally incapable of achieving essential structural changes as needed to effectively combat climate change (achievements and shortcomings of the CDM are for example discussed in Haya, 2009;Schneider, 2009;Spalding-Fecher et al, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%