Assessing the acquisition of anticipatory responding in the pigeon using reaction time.

Abstract

We report a novel method for investigating the acquisition of anticipatory responding in the pigeon. Four pigeons () received food for pecking a starburst target stimulus displayed in the bottom-left or bottom-right portion of a computer screen. The target stimulus was preceded by 1 of 3 fractal images displayed in either the upper-left or upper-right portion of the screen: 1 of the fractals was perfectly correlated with the target appearing in the bottom-left, the second fractal was perfectly correlated with the target appearing in the bottom-right, and the third fractal was uncorrelated with the location of the target. The pigeons learned to anticipate the location of the upcoming target stimulus, because they were faster to peck the target stimulus on trials that involved a predictive fractal than on trials that involved a nonpredictive fractal. In a later phase, we reversed the signaled target location of each of the 2 predictive fractals. After an initial disruption in performance, the pigeons successfully learned the new stimulus assignments, exhibiting the same pattern of responding as during the initial training phase. Overall, the results document the utility of this novel training procedure and further underscore the role that associative processes play in anticipatory responding. (PsycINFO Database Record

Precrastination: The fierce urgency of now

“…García-Gallardo, Navarro, and Wasserman (2017) All of the research that I have reviewed so far has involved an element of choice: one step in the trial sequence forced pigeons to choose one response option rather than another. Was such a choice a necessary feature of the experimental design in order to sensitively measure pigeons' ability to anticipate responding in one spatial location rather than another?…”

Enhanced attention in rats following blast-induced traumatic brain injury

“…In our present study, we develop a comprehensive rodent model of learning following bTBI, by giving rats a series of increasingly difficult visual discrimination tasks that recruit increasingly complex cognitive functions: from motivation (the overall level of engagement in the task at hand) to selective visual attention [ 15 ] (the ability to prioritize the processing of relevant over irrelevant information). Two days after bTBI, rats received an introductory, response chaining task; this task allowed measurement of short-term changes in overall motivation and overall ability to engage in anticipatory learning [ 16 ]. Then, rats received a conditional discrimination task, in which the value of two choices depended upon the identity of another visual stimulus; this task allowed for the measurement of changes in strongly supervised learning and the incidence of perseverative errors.…”