2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.algal.2017.11.032
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing textile wastewater treatment in an anoxic-aerobic photobioreactor and the potential of the treated water for irrigation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
27
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Results showed that the system is suitable for textile wastewater treatment, and a higher reduction efficiency of dyes and COD can be achieved within the system without co-substrate. Dhaouefi et al (2018) examined the suitability of using an anoxic/aerobic photobioreactor for carbon and nutrient removal from synthetic textile wastewater. The mixture of synthetic wastewater contained soaping agent, anticrease, dispersing agent, electrolyte, alkaline agent, reducing agent, acid generation, as well as the dyes disperse blue 1 and disperse orange 3.…”
Section: Constituents Treated By Other Biological Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Results showed that the system is suitable for textile wastewater treatment, and a higher reduction efficiency of dyes and COD can be achieved within the system without co-substrate. Dhaouefi et al (2018) examined the suitability of using an anoxic/aerobic photobioreactor for carbon and nutrient removal from synthetic textile wastewater. The mixture of synthetic wastewater contained soaping agent, anticrease, dispersing agent, electrolyte, alkaline agent, reducing agent, acid generation, as well as the dyes disperse blue 1 and disperse orange 3.…”
Section: Constituents Treated By Other Biological Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The same was observed for the study of Przystaś et al (2018), but with opposite results. In addition to these observations, phytotoxicity analysis of wastewater treated only by biological methods, most of the times showed about 50% or less in toxicity reduction, while when biological treatments are combined with other treatments, the toxicity reduction increase (Dhaouefi et al, 2018;Waghmode et al, 2019). Yu et al (2019) studied the correlation between the toxicity reduction of 12 wastewater treatment plants, from an industrial park, with the treatment process.…”
Section: Importance Of Toxicity Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This can modify the penetration of sunlight into water bodies and change solubility of atmospheric gases, altering photosynthesis and therefore the entire aquatic ecosystem ( O’Neill et al, 1999 ; Saratale et al, 2011 ; Gonçalves et al, 2017 ; Rather et al, 2018 ). In addition, the toxic, mutagenic and carcinogenic effect of several compounds present in the effluents, such as dyes, have been demonstrated ( Saratale et al, 2011 ; Dhaouefi et al, 2018 ). Moreover, withdrawal of heavy metals by some chemicals used as mordents, eventually increases wastewater toxicity ( Dhaouefi et al, 2018 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It has also been observed that approximately 10–15% of the dyes used in the textile industry enter into the environment as waste (Inoue et al , 2006). Characterized by high Chemical Oxidation Demand (COD; 0.55–1.71 g/L), Total Organic Carbon (TOC; 0.14–0.29 g/L), Biological Oxygen Demand (BOD; 0.09–0.41 g/L), Total suspended solids (TSS; 0.1–0.13 g/L), Total dissolved solids (TDS; 3.7–3.9 g/L), pH (6–11) and colour content (50–2500), these textile effluents have toxic and mutagenic on human health and aquatic ecosystems (Asghar et al , 2015; Dhaouefi et al , 2018; Pazdzior et al , 2018). Therefore, on average 90% of the water used in textile operations needs an end‐of‐pipe treatment (Silva et al , 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%