Assessing Technology Implementation Success for Highway Construction and Asset Management

Tripathi, Amit; Dadi, Gabriel B.; Nassereddine, Hala; Sturgill, Roy; Mitchell, Alexa

doi:10.3390/s23073671

Cited by 5 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 16 publications

(21 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Level 5: Optimizing—DOTs fully implement technologies and find ways to implement them in other projects and areas, technologies collaborate, and the DOT updates its implementation plan as required ( 14 ).…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Level 4: Quantitatively managed-DOTs fully use technologies in all possible projects throughout the state organization, in appropriate applications, and are managed properly. Level 5: Optimizing-DOTs fully implement technologies and find ways to implement them in other projects and areas, technologies collaborate, and the DOT updates its implementation plan as required (14).…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

People, Process, and Technology Maturity Levels for Successful Technology Implementation by State Departments of Transportation

Tripathi

Nassereddine

Sturgill

et al. 2023

Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation R

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The demand for safe, reliable, and higher-quality infrastructure systems often increases the complexity of transportation construction projects and necessitates more comprehensive evaluation methods. This often leads to the incorporation of technologies for oversight and management. With a focus on effective technology implementation, this research stretches beyond simply evaluating technologies to consider integrating the technology with personnel and procedures at departments of transportation (DOTs). Drawing from literature and a survey of state DOT personnel, this study applies and evaluates maturity models for people, process, and technology with regard to technology implementation at DOTs. The findings support the need for understanding technology implementation in the aspects of people, process, and technology maturity to improve the probability of implementation success. The framework allows DOTs to move toward higher maturity levels and improve the likelihood of implementation success. The study’s objective is to assess the importance of people, process, and technology as implementation dimensions that state DOTs need to focus on for successfully implementing technologies. The idea and scope of the paper can be extended to any new technology implementation efforts at DOTs, including Automatic Identification and Data Capture technologies, emerging sensing and wireless technologies, safety technologies, and others. The maturity models presented enable organizations to audit and benchmark their status for technology implementation, and the relative levels allow these organizations to advance from basic to advanced stages. This paper introduces three maturity models for people, process, and technology, their adaptation to DOT operations, and their possible future use, as presented through preliminary survey results. The final result of this study provides a maturity model methodology for successful technology implementation and a self-assessment tool for state DOTs to gauge and improve their current maturity levels. Preliminary validation of these products was conducted via a workshop of subject matter experts, and the results indicate that state DOTs can use these products to self-assess their organization’s maturity and devise a plan as required for improved technology implementation.

show abstract

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

People, Process, and Technology Maturity Levels for Successful Technology Implementation by State Departments of Transportation

Tripathi

Nassereddine

Sturgill

et al. 2023

Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation R

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Furthermore, instances of wasteful spending and mismanagement indicate suboptimal utilization of public funds [18]. Moreover, despite government interest in adopting new technologies, the absence of clear implementation guidelines often results in unsuccessful endeavors, underscoring the need for a deeper understanding of factors contributing to successful technology adoption [19]. According to [20], effective bridge management entails three primary processes: comprehending assets, decision-making, and implementing interventions.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Intention of Bridge Asset Management Implementation in Indonesia

Sastrawiria,

Seigo

2024

Buildings

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The need for effective bridge asset management in Indonesia has become crucial. Currently, the number of bridge assets in Indonesia is continuously increasing, parallel to the rising budget allocations for infrastructure development in the road and bridge sectors to enhance regional connectivity more efficiently. This situation places demands on asset managers to work harder and possess expertise in bridge asset management. However, the reality reveals persistent issues related to the inability of bridge asset managers in various regions to manage their assets effectively. This raises the question of whether asset managers have the intention to implement asset management or what factors might drive their appeal to have an intention towards effective asset management. To address these questions, a survey was conducted involving asset managers and experts to evaluate the current state of bridge asset management in Indonesia. The research findings provide insights into the relationships among factors associated with bridge asset management, such as budget, data, policy, resources, and system, and the intentions of asset managers. The model’s solutions show that data and system are anticipated to achieve effective and efficient implementation of bridge asset management. It is hoped that this research will assist asset managers in Indonesia in enhancing their intention towards better bridge asset management.

show abstract

Investigating Implementation Factors for Successful Technology Implementation at State DOTs

Tripathi,

Sturgill,

Dadi

et al. 2024

Construction Research Congress 2024

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Assessing Technology Implementation Success for Highway Construction and Asset Management

Cited by 5 publications

References 16 publications

People, Process, and Technology Maturity Levels for Successful Technology Implementation by State Departments of Transportation

People, Process, and Technology Maturity Levels for Successful Technology Implementation by State Departments of Transportation

The Intention of Bridge Asset Management Implementation in Indonesia

Investigating Implementation Factors for Successful Technology Implementation at State DOTs

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About