Assessing synergies and trade-offs between ecosystem services in forest landscape management

Jafarzadeh, Ali Akbar; Mahdavi, Ali; Shamsi, Seyed Rashid Fallah; Yousefpour, Rasoul

doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105741

Cited by 32 publications

(20 citation statements)

References 44 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…There could be synergistic or compensation effects or trade-offs in both cases, with the first consisting of the mutual benefit generated by the interaction of ecosystem services. The latter implies a possible win-lose situation or vice versa since the ability to obtain the benefits of a given ecosystem service reduces the possibility of obtaining other services [60,61]. Figure 8, taken from Power [17], shows the interactions between ecosystem services in terms of their synergies and trade-off (ecosystem disservices) based on a conceptualization of rural agroecosystem environment.…”

Section: Discussion: Ecosystem Services and Local Interactions In A Rural Environmentmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Climate 2021, 9, x FOR PEER REVIEW 11 of 17 possibility of obtaining other services [60,61]. Figure 8, taken from Power [17], shows the interactions between ecosystem services in terms of their synergies and trade-off (ecosystem disservices) based on a conceptualization of rural agroecosystem environment.…”

Section: Discussion: Ecosystem Services and Local Interactions In A Rural Environmentmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…In any case, at the local level, the ability to capture the benefits of positive ecosystem services and minimize adverse offsetting effects will depend on the local adaptive capacity, which is a multiscale phenomenon for a much more medium-long-term perspective, accounting for the economic resources, technology, information and skills, infrastructure, institutions, and equity in supporting processes of adaptation to climate change, with sensitivity drivers in the connection zones in which individuals, families, productive systems, and social structures and networks overlap [18,59,61]. Figure 9 shows a primary perspective on the complexity perspective developed in this article concerning the Boca de Cachón case.…”

Section: Discussion: Ecosystem Services and Local Interactions In A Rural Environmentmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

The Incredible and Sad Story of Boca de Cachón: How a Rural Community in the Hispaniola Is in a Prolonged, Heartless, and Predictable Climate Crisis

Gómez-Valenzuela

Ramirez

Bonilla-Duarte

2021

Climate

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This article aims to briefly review the socio-economic impact caused by the flooding of Lake Enriquillo on the inhabitants of Boca Cachón due to the complex local phenomenon related to climate variability. Between 2003 and 2014, Boca de Cachón and the communities surrounding Lake Enriquillo were deeply affected by flooding of the Lake’s rising waters. Lake Enriquillo is the largest wetland in the Caribbean and the first designated RAMSAR site. In turn, Boca de Cachón could be considered the first human settlement formally displaced because of climate variability in the Dominican Republic and probably one of the first in the Americas in the twenty-first century. Boca de Cachón is a rural Municipal District located to the northwest of the municipality of Jimaní, with a population of around 3000 inhabitants on the southwest border with the Republic of Haiti and located in the Biosphere Reserve Jaragua-Bahoruco-Enriquillo. Given the future climatic scenarios for the Dominican Republic and the possible climate change that could exacerbate by excess or, by default, the socio-environmental problems in the Lake’s belt, it is necessary to support the communities in their capacity-building processes. The lessons learned from Boca de Cachón can serve as a learning space for adaptation processes in rural environments in the Caribbean region.

show abstract

Section: Discussion: Ecosystem Services and Local Interactions In A Rural Environmentmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Discussion: Ecosystem Services and Local Interactions In A Rural Environmentmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Discussion: Ecosystem Services and Local Interactions In A Rural Environmentmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

The Incredible and Sad Story of Boca de Cachón: How a Rural Community in the Hispaniola Is in a Prolonged, Heartless, and Predictable Climate Crisis

Gómez-Valenzuela

Ramirez

Bonilla-Duarte

2021

Climate

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…For each of the four ecosystem services, the quartiles produced three‐level classes and were coded 1, 2, and 3, representing low (lower than the 30th percentile), medium (between the 30th and 70th percentiles), and high (higher than the 70th percentile), respectively. We then determined interaction codes (

IC

) by combining into an ES bundle using Equation () (Cademus et al, 2014; Jafarzadeh et al, 2021):

IC = B_{1} \times 1000 + B_{2} \times 100 + B_{3} \times 10 + B_{4}

Where :

IC

is the type of interaction (four‐digit code);

B_{1}

denotes the crop production bundle;

B_{2}

is the carbon sequestration bundle;

B_{3}

stands for the soil conservation bundle, and

B_{4}

represents the water conservation bundle. The

IC

between 1111 and 3333 that denoted an ES bundle for each grid cell and was classified into grid cell where at least two of ES are dominant (i.e., synergy) and grid cell where one of the ES is dominant (i.e., a trade‐off).…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…We then determined interaction codes (IC) by combining into an ES bundle using Equation (2) (Cademus et al, 2014;Jafarzadeh et al, 2021):…”

Section: Identification and Dynamics Of Es Bundlesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Dynamics arising from the impact of large‐scale afforestation on ecosystem services

Wang

2022

Land Degrad Dev

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Understanding how multiple ecosystem services interact, how trade-offs emerge, and how interactions among ecosystem services may change after the Grain-for-Green-Program (GFGP) and is critical for managing multiple ecosystem services.Here, we conducted a spatiotemporal approach to quantify the impact of large-scale afforestation on four key ecosystem services (i.e., crop production, soil conservation, carbon sequestration, and water conservation). We observed that three satellite datasets (i.e., GIMMS-LAI3g, GIMMS-NDVI3g, and NDVI-ESTARFM) time-series show a slightly improved and significantly improved trends, and crop production, carbon sequestration, soil conservation, and water conservation have improved after the implementation of GFGP. Simultaneously, almost 49% of the low levels and 58% of the high levels for all four of the ecosystem services considered changed after the implementation of GFGP. The results also show that relationships among ecosystem services have shifted from a trade-off in 1988 and 1999 to an apparent synergistic relationship in 2011.We conclude that GFGP is a successful programme for addressing trade-offs between services. Our study provides experiential support for largescale restoration programme in humid area around the World.

show abstract

Exploring the urban–rural gradient effects of construction land expansion processes on land use function trade‐off/synergy in rapidly urbanizing areas

Li,

Zhu,

Deng

2023

Land Degrad Dev

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Construction land expansion greatly affects the supply and interaction of distinct land use functions, particularly in rapidly urbanizing areas. However, existing research rarely focuses on the urban–rural gradient role of different construction land expansion processes in affecting the interactions between land use functions, which limits the refined high‐quality development of territorial space. Using the main urban area of Hangzhou as an example, this research analyzed the spatiotemporal transmission process of trade‐offs/synergies among distinct functions between urban and rural regions from the living‐production‐ecological function perspective, and probed the differences in the impact of distinct urban and rural construction land expansion processes on them across different urban–rural gradients, thereby proposing the urban–rural spatial development pathways for promoting synergistic territorial spatial patterns. The results showed that the changes in different functions had an obvious urban–rural gradient difference. During 2000–2020, the trade‐off between living function and other functions increased continuously, and regions with a higher trade‐off primarily shifted from urban development areas to urban–rural transition areas. The infilling and edge‐expansion of urban construction land were more favorable to the increased synergy between distinct functions; the infilling and edge‐expansion of rural construction land in urban development and urban–rural transition areas greatly reduced the functional trade‐off level, while its leapfrogging in rural development areas strongly affected the synergy between distinct functions. These findings can help to restrict unreasonable urban and rural construction land expansion processes as well as promote synergistic territorial space patterns in rapidly urbanizing regions.

show abstract

Assessing synergies and trade-offs between ecosystem services in forest landscape management

Cited by 32 publications

References 44 publications

The Incredible and Sad Story of Boca de Cachón: How a Rural Community in the Hispaniola Is in a Prolonged, Heartless, and Predictable Climate Crisis

The Incredible and Sad Story of Boca de Cachón: How a Rural Community in the Hispaniola Is in a Prolonged, Heartless, and Predictable Climate Crisis

Dynamics arising from the impact of large‐scale afforestation on ecosystem services

Exploring the urban–rural gradient effects of construction land expansion processes on land use function trade‐off/synergy in rapidly urbanizing areas

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About