2017
DOI: 10.4103/2542-4157.213700
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing surgical methods for treatment of cubital tunnel syndrome - which is the best?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although stringent methodological criteria have been sufficiently fulfilled in both of the study protocol & the commentary article, 1,2 besides that the study protocol has been designed to permit randomized allocation of participants, which is often considered the gold standard for a clinical trial; however, surgeons increasingly recognized the limitations of a randomized clinical trial, where there are inevitable number of variables that are not amenable for randomization such as, each patient had unique baseline findings, each surgeon had different skills, and each operation involved countless choices about anesthesia, premedication, surgical approach, instrumentation, and postoperative care, all of which challenged the notion that clinical trials are insistently required. 3 As a critical appraisal for the clinical trial study protocol of Liu et al, 1 potential areas of improvement of the protocol could enhance the study yield, mostly from the statistical analysis point of view still remains.…”
Section: Commentarymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although stringent methodological criteria have been sufficiently fulfilled in both of the study protocol & the commentary article, 1,2 besides that the study protocol has been designed to permit randomized allocation of participants, which is often considered the gold standard for a clinical trial; however, surgeons increasingly recognized the limitations of a randomized clinical trial, where there are inevitable number of variables that are not amenable for randomization such as, each patient had unique baseline findings, each surgeon had different skills, and each operation involved countless choices about anesthesia, premedication, surgical approach, instrumentation, and postoperative care, all of which challenged the notion that clinical trials are insistently required. 3 As a critical appraisal for the clinical trial study protocol of Liu et al, 1 potential areas of improvement of the protocol could enhance the study yield, mostly from the statistical analysis point of view still remains.…”
Section: Commentarymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Peripheral nerve injuries (PNIs) are often multifaceted and present various degrees of severity, potential ischemia, tissue deficits, etc. [1,2] In many cases, treatment of the nerve injury is delayed for several weeks to handle more immediate concerns of vascular and orthopedic stabilization, and the prevention of infections. [3,4] Delaying PNI treatment, however, can result in severe long-term consequences.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%