1998
DOI: 10.1353/aad.2012.0080
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing Substance Abuse Problems in Deaf and Hard of Hearing Individuals

Abstract: Professionals who provide services to deaf and hard of hearing individuals may encounter situations related to abuse of alcohol and other drugs. Getting access to an agency that can provide an appropriate chemical dependency assessment for a deaf or hard of hearing person is difficult because there are no formalized assessment tools normed or specifically designed to use with such individuals. Additionally, most assessors are unfamiliar with how to work with deaf and hard of hearing people, less likely to be f… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As stated above, a common problem in assessing Deaf clients is the use of language and jargon that is not familiar to the individual (Guthmann, 1999; Alexander et al , 2005). In relation to substance use assessment or screening, Guthmann and Sandberg (1998) give an example of the use of the word “black‐out”. This may have to be explained to the Deaf person in addition to, or instead of, using the term “black‐out”.…”
Section: Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…As stated above, a common problem in assessing Deaf clients is the use of language and jargon that is not familiar to the individual (Guthmann, 1999; Alexander et al , 2005). In relation to substance use assessment or screening, Guthmann and Sandberg (1998) give an example of the use of the word “black‐out”. This may have to be explained to the Deaf person in addition to, or instead of, using the term “black‐out”.…”
Section: Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, the use of time and rating scales is not advisable as they may not be readily understood by the Deaf community. Few clients will ask for an explanation or clarification of terminology, but instead may respond to the question without understanding it completely (Guthmann and Sandberg, 1998). For this reason, also, screening tools may elicit inaccurate results so full assessment and discussion is more beneficial.…”
Section: Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…While deaf people's written English may range from functional illiteracy to mastery (Brauer, Braden, Pollard, & Hardy-Braz, 1998), the median reading comprehension for 17- and 18-year-old students is at the fourth grade (Gallaudet Research Institute, 1996). Compounding deaf persons' access to substance abuse information is the lack of expertise on the part of hearing professionals in both the language and the culture of deaf persons (Guthmann & Graham, 2004; Guthmann & Blozis, 2001; Guthmann & Sandberg, 1998; Pollard, 1996). Deaf people are part of a linguistic minority whose primary language is ASL.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although routine assessment of SUD is important to ensure that customers who are in need of substance use services are identified and referred so they may receive such services, major barriers prevent widespread screening of SUD in rehabilitation populations. These barriers include (a) the lack of a screening instrument specifically validated for persons with disabilities; (b) the lack of an instrument that includes items to assess the abuse of prescription medications (Moore & Polsgrove, 1991; Olkin, 1999); and (c) administration barriers for persons who have sensory (Guthman & Sandberg, 1998), physical (Heinemann, 1993), or cognitive impairments (Degenhardt, 2000). VR and other employment service professionals are pressed for time that is needed for in-depth clinical interviews regarding substance use history.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%