2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.appdev.2017.03.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing students' executive functions in the classroom: Validating a scalable group-based procedure

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
50
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
5
50
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, at this age, it is possible that children can perform some of the requested tasks, but they need direct help from others or supporting representations using, for example, language. Hence, we have started to test children at 2 years of age in small groups to capture social "cognitive" skills 45 , and there seems to be some interest in the field for capturing more ecologically valid skills 46 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, at this age, it is possible that children can perform some of the requested tasks, but they need direct help from others or supporting representations using, for example, language. Hence, we have started to test children at 2 years of age in small groups to capture social "cognitive" skills 45 , and there seems to be some interest in the field for capturing more ecologically valid skills 46 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following Davidson et al (), we chose a 2,500 ms time response window after the stimulus onset for the preschool children (younger than 6.5 years old). For school children (older than 6.5 years old), we followed the recommendations of previous researchers and extended the original time window (750 ms), resulting in a time window of 1,500 ms (Calderon et al, ; Obradović, Sulik, Finch, & Tirado‐Strayer, ). Following a response, children received visual and auditory feedback with a low‐pitched tone of 500 ms accompanied by a surprised face for an incorrect response (same feedback was used in case of no‐response trials), and a high‐pitched tone of 500 ms accompanied by a happy face for a correct response.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Group-based assessments were used to minimize disruption for teachers and students. The tasks were simultaneously administered to all students in each classroom using tablet computers, which has been shown to be as valid and reliable as individual administration of the same tasks (Obradović et al 2018). Relative to individual assessments, these group-based assessments may have greater ecological validity because they occur in a naturalistic classroom setting.…”
Section: Executive Functionsmentioning
confidence: 99%