1992
DOI: 10.1093/elt/46.3.294
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing speaking skills: a workshop for teacher development

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
19
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While Brown (2004) argues for grammar, vocabulary, comprehension, fluency, pronunciation, and task (pp. 172-173), Ben Knight (1992) stresses the insertion of the following assessment criteria: grammar (range and accuracy), vocabulary (range and correctness), pronunciation (individual sound, stress and rhythm, intonation, linking, elision and assimilation), fluency (the use of hesitation markers and temporal variables), conversational Skill (ensuring topic development, taking initiatives, being consistent, keeping conversation going), sociolinguistic skill (appropriate use of register and style, use of cultural references), non-verbal (maintaining eye contact, relaxed body posture, appropriate use of gestures and facial expressions) and content (consistency in terms of arguments and relevance).…”
Section: International Journal Of English Linguisticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While Brown (2004) argues for grammar, vocabulary, comprehension, fluency, pronunciation, and task (pp. 172-173), Ben Knight (1992) stresses the insertion of the following assessment criteria: grammar (range and accuracy), vocabulary (range and correctness), pronunciation (individual sound, stress and rhythm, intonation, linking, elision and assimilation), fluency (the use of hesitation markers and temporal variables), conversational Skill (ensuring topic development, taking initiatives, being consistent, keeping conversation going), sociolinguistic skill (appropriate use of register and style, use of cultural references), non-verbal (maintaining eye contact, relaxed body posture, appropriate use of gestures and facial expressions) and content (consistency in terms of arguments and relevance).…”
Section: International Journal Of English Linguisticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are many challenges in the assessment of oral skills in a second-language including: defining language proficiency, avoiding cultural biases, and attaining validity (Sánchez, 2006). Assessment of speaking skills often lags far behind the importance given to teaching those skills in the curriculum (Knight, 1992). Assessment drives university teaching in Pakistan.…”
Section: Assessment Of English Speaking Skillsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The teachers are not properly trained to conduct oral assessments in Pakistan. The teachers are either reluctant to test oral ability or lack confidence in the validity of their assessments (Knight, 1992). The lack of public trust on oral examination makes the situation more complex (Bashir, 2011).…”
Section: Challenges About Assessment Of Spoken Englishmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, in assessing speaking skills, teachers usually use an assessment rubric. One of the assessment rubrics comes from Knight (1992), he points out that there are eight lists of assessment criteria, such as a) grammar, b) vocabulary, c) pronunciation, d) fluency, e) conservational skill, f) sociolinguistic, g) non-verbal and h) content.…”
Section: Code-switchingmentioning
confidence: 99%