2015
DOI: 10.5194/isprsannals-ii-2-w2-75-2015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing Spatial Data Quality of Participatory Gis Studies: A Case Study in Cape Town

Abstract: ABSTRACT:Participatory GIS (PGIS) has been prescribed by scholars who sought to find a means to enable more equitable access to GIS data, diversifying the types of knowledge captured by a GIS and re-engineering GIS software. The popularity of PGIS is evident in the various studies and contexts in which it has been utilised. These include studies in risk assessment, land administration, resource management, crime mapping and urban design to mention but a few. Despite the popularity of PGIS as a body of research… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The perception of each respondent about the exact size of the measures is different, which causes many differences in the quantitative measurements of flood depth between the information from the respondents and the data obtained in the field. This finding is the same as that of Musungu ( 2015 ), who has mentioned this regarding the results from participatory mapping, which are mostly in the form of public perceptions with various measurements that are more qualitative than quantitative data. However, qualitative data obtained from participatory mapping has high accuracy because the respondents are people who have lived in the area for a long time, so they have rich knowledge of the conditions of the area.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…The perception of each respondent about the exact size of the measures is different, which causes many differences in the quantitative measurements of flood depth between the information from the respondents and the data obtained in the field. This finding is the same as that of Musungu ( 2015 ), who has mentioned this regarding the results from participatory mapping, which are mostly in the form of public perceptions with various measurements that are more qualitative than quantitative data. However, qualitative data obtained from participatory mapping has high accuracy because the respondents are people who have lived in the area for a long time, so they have rich knowledge of the conditions of the area.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Recommendations for integrating GIS into systematic inventory approaches include incorporating spatial and temporal data components, ensuring regular updates of data sets, and fostering data exchange among relevant agencies. Community participation and cross-referencing available data sources are essential for effective GIS integration and enhancing the systematic inventory approach to studying coastal informal settlements, as suggested by the respondent and supported by Silva et al (2018) and Musungu (2015).…”
Section: Recommendations For Gis Integrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, [66] describes seven crucial information that characterizes quality to include availability, integrity, compliance, reliability, efficiency, effectiveness and confidentiality. With respect to these principles and characteristics, spatial data quality is grouped into two components: internal quality which corresponds to the extent of similarity between data produced and ideal data that should have been produced and external quality that corresponds to the level of conformance that exists between spatial data products and user's needs within a given context [67]. In relation to these two components, data quality audit parameters are grouped into eight elements: accuracy, lineage, currency, completeness, consistency, coverage, adequacy & reliability.…”
Section: Data Qualitymentioning
confidence: 99%