2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0962-6298(99)00047-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing South Carolina's 1990s congressional districting

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
60
0
1

Year Published

2003
2003
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
60
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These previous studies have often used automated redistricting in order to obtain a baseline against which to detect the intentions of those drawing the lines. Cirincione et al (2003) use a simulated districting algorithm to detect racial gerrymandering in South Carolina's congressional districting plan, while Altman and McDonald (2004) propose an enhanced method of this algorithm for detecting partisan gerrymandering. Johnston and Hughes (2008) apply an automated districting algorithm in Brisbane, Australia in order to gain a baseline against which to compare the boundaries chosen by neutral commissioners.…”
Section: Automated Districting and Electoral Biasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These previous studies have often used automated redistricting in order to obtain a baseline against which to detect the intentions of those drawing the lines. Cirincione et al (2003) use a simulated districting algorithm to detect racial gerrymandering in South Carolina's congressional districting plan, while Altman and McDonald (2004) propose an enhanced method of this algorithm for detecting partisan gerrymandering. Johnston and Hughes (2008) apply an automated districting algorithm in Brisbane, Australia in order to gain a baseline against which to compare the boundaries chosen by neutral commissioners.…”
Section: Automated Districting and Electoral Biasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…there often exists at least some suspicion that a state's districts have been gerrymandered in some way, even in states with bipartisan or nonpartisan commissions or in states where mapmakers proclaim to be neutral. since it is difficult to estimate the nongerrymandered counterfactual using comparable elections, researchers have recently turned to simulating it using computer-automated districting algorithms (Chen and Cottrell 2016;Cirincione, darling, and O'rourke 2000;Fifield et al 2015;Fryer Jr. and Holden 2011;Krasno et al 2016;Magleby and Mosesson 2018). 4 these algorithms are designed to reproduce the districting process by aggregating Census blocks into a predetermined number of contiguous and equally populated geographic jurisdictions.…”
Section: Measuring the Effect Of Gerrymandering By Establishing The Nmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• Political districting for the definition of electoral areas (Mehrotra et al, 1998;Cirincione et al, 2000;Bozcaya et al, 2003).…”
Section: The Districting Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%