2011
DOI: 10.1016/s1002-0160(11)60143-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing Soil Water Retention Characteristics and Their Spatial Variability Using Pedotransfer Functions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
18
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
3
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Analyzing the empirical 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 Table 2, it can be concluded that in the case of the forest soils occurring in the pine and spruce ecosystems the bulk density (ρ b ), specific density (ρ p ), organic matter content (C org ), sand fraction from 1 to 0.1 mm (S a ), silt fraction from 0.1 to 0.02 mm (S i ), and content of particles smaller than 0.02 mm (S pl ) had essential impact on soil water retention characteristics. The obtained results in the forms of empirical equations generally are in agreement with data presented in the literature [5,15,29]. However, it should be stressed that forecasting of the field capacity, commonly assumed at pF=2, which is a very important soil moisture status [6,32], the S pl fraction content was required.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Analyzing the empirical 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 Table 2, it can be concluded that in the case of the forest soils occurring in the pine and spruce ecosystems the bulk density (ρ b ), specific density (ρ p ), organic matter content (C org ), sand fraction from 1 to 0.1 mm (S a ), silt fraction from 0.1 to 0.02 mm (S i ), and content of particles smaller than 0.02 mm (S pl ) had essential impact on soil water retention characteristics. The obtained results in the forms of empirical equations generally are in agreement with data presented in the literature [5,15,29]. However, it should be stressed that forecasting of the field capacity, commonly assumed at pF=2, which is a very important soil moisture status [6,32], the S pl fraction content was required.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 85%
“…The X i values represent explanatory variables regarding physical properties, particle soil distribution, and soil organic matter content. The set of independent variables describing moisture contents were determined with the use of the backward stepwise elimination method [29]. Finally, the regression coefficients (β i ) were obtained by solving a set of simultaneous linear equations.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…>100 000 km 2 ), a series of predictive methods such as pedotransfer functions (PTFs) have been used to overcome the challenge of collecting a large number of soil samples and of determining the corresponding SWRCs [11,[14][15][16]. However, in practice these methods have not generated accurate results when the PTFs were applied to soils outside of the region for which they were originally developed [17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Liao et al (2011) evaluated the performance of a PTF developed by Rawls et al (1982), which also assumes Eq. [1], for similar soils of this study to predict the SV of soil water retention.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%