Assessing socioeconomic health care utilization inequity in Israel: impact of alternative approaches to morbidity adjustment

Abstract

BackgroundThe ability to accurately detect differential resource use between persons of different socioeconomic status relies on the accuracy of health-needs adjustment measures. This study tests different approaches to morbidity adjustment in explanation of health care utilization inequity.MethodsA representative sample was selected of 10 percent (~270,000) adult enrolees of Clalit Health Services, Israel's largest health care organization. The Johns-Hopkins University Adjusted Clinical Groups® were used to assess each person's overall morbidity burden based on one year's (2009) diagnostic information. The odds of above average health care resource use (primary care visits, specialty visits, diagnostic tests, or hospitalizations) were tested using multivariate logistic regression models, separately adjusting for levels of health-need using data on age and gender, comorbidity (using the Charlson Comorbidity Index), or morbidity burden (using the Adjusted Clinical Groups). Model fit was assessed using tests of the Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristics Curve and the Akaike Information Criteria.ResultsLow socioeconomic status was associated with higher morbidity burden (1.5-fold difference). Adjusting for health needs using age and gender or the Charlson index, persons of low socioeconomic status had greater odds of above average resource use for all types of services examined (primary care and specialist visits, diagnostic tests, or hospitalizations). In contrast, after adjustment for overall morbidity burden (using Adjusted Clinical Groups), low socioeconomic status was no longer associated with greater odds of specialty care or diagnostic tests (OR: 0.95, CI: 0.94-0.99; and OR: 0.91, CI: 0.86-0.96, for specialty visits and diagnostic respectively). Tests of model fit showed that adjustment using the comprehensive morbidity burden measure provided a better fit than age and gender or the Charlson Index.ConclusionsIdentification of socioeconomic differences in health care utilization is an important step in disparity reduction efforts. Adjustment for health-needs using a comprehensive morbidity burden diagnoses-based measure, this study showed relative underutilization in use of specialist and diagnostic services, and thus allowed for identification of inequity in health resources use, which could not be detected with less comprehensive forms of health-needs adjustments.

Economic Analysis of Health Inequality Among the Elderly in Ghana

“…It is well documented that the burden of non-communicable diseases (NCDs) is on the rise in developing countries (Aboderin 2010;Shadmi et al 2011;Hosseinpoor et al 2012;Wu et al 2013). Non-communicable diseases may be from lifetime exposure to detrimental health determinants and modifiable causes of diseases.…”

Epidemic Use of Benzodiazepines among Older Adults in Israel: Epidemiology and Leverage Points for Improvement

“…Low socioeconomic status was identified by the presence of pharmacy subsidies given to patients with low economic means. 19 The burden of multimorbidity was estimated with the Adjusted Clinical Groups ® (ACG ® ) case-mix system. 20…”

Health information exchange systems and length of stay in readmissions to a different hospital

“…We examined the following known correlates of length of stay (LOS): age, gender, residency in a nursing home, socioeconomic status (SES) based on an indicator of social security entitlement received by low‐income members, and the occurrence of common chronic conditions registered in Clalit's EHR registries: congestive heart failure (CHF), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), chronic renal failure (CRF), malignancy, diabetes, hypertension, ischemic heart disease, atrial fibrillation, asthma, and disability (indication of a functional limitation). To provide comorbidity adjustment we used the Charlson Comorbidity Index .…”