Assessing socio-technical resistance to public policy instruments: Insights from water performance indicators in the Grenoble area (France)

Abstract

This article puts forward the notion of socio-technical resistance with an application to the regulation through performance indicators in the water sector. Governance failures are mainly explained by concentrating on governance design, considering regulation as a set of control mechanisms. We propose an alternative perspective by putting the emphasis on socio-technical resistance to take into account both human and non-human actors in the governance process. We observe the misuse of performance indicators by local actors in urban water systems in Europe to highlight the empirical significance of socio-technical resistance. Results support that socio-technical resistance is frequent and reduces significantly the reliability of the information gathered through performance indicators. Drawing on a new typology of resistance, we show socio-technical resistance is a dynamic combination of cognitive, interpretative, territorial, strategic, technical and structural factors. These results and the proposed notion underline a crucial limitation of public policies and regulation in the process of policy-instruments implementation and compliance. Empirically, it reveals particularly relevant to provide new insights on New public management and performance-based regulation, where measurement are crucial.

Exploring performance paradox in public organizations: Analyzing the predictors of distortive behaviors in performance measurement

“…design and use of the system, instability, coupling of incentives/punishment; Pollitt, 2013). Thus, scholars argued that distortions in performance measurement, especially when relying only on the data provided by agents, are exposed to the high risk for measurement errors (Bolognesi et al, 2021; Bolognesi and Pflieger, 2021; Pollitt, 2013). For example, respondents could be pressured to give socially desirable responses to the survey questions because distortive behaviors in performance measurement are perceived as negative unlawful practices that may disturb the purpose of performance measurement.…”

The Panopticon reloaded: A critical analysis of performance management systems in the trans-European transport network policy

“…Riding the wave of New Public Management (NPM) reforms, since the 1970s PMSs have spread in many countries across various policy areas, including megaprojects (Bolognesi et al, 2021; Lewis, 2015; Merkus and Veenswijk, 2017; Terlizzi and Esposito, 2021; Van Helden et al, 2012). The rationale behind these tools lies in the belief that the public sector works better if public administrative bodies are oriented toward results, rather than being focused on processes.…”