2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2010.01.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing sensitivity of source term estimation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Mobile sensors can estimate the source term more efficiently as they can be rapidly deployed and collect observational data from more informative locations. Kuroki et al (2010) used an expert system for sensor motion planning, while the genetic algorithm from Long et al (2010) estimated the source term of the dispersing contaminant. Ristic et al (2010) used mobile sensors to estimate the source term of a radiological release.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Mobile sensors can estimate the source term more efficiently as they can be rapidly deployed and collect observational data from more informative locations. Kuroki et al (2010) used an expert system for sensor motion planning, while the genetic algorithm from Long et al (2010) estimated the source term of the dispersing contaminant. Ristic et al (2010) used mobile sensors to estimate the source term of a radiological release.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most popular approach to STE features a static network of concentration sensors spread over a large region on the ground. Source estimation is then carried out using optimization (Long et al (2010); Thomson et al (2007)) or Bayesian inference algorithms (Keats et al (2007); Senocak et al (2008)) where inferred source parameters are run in a forward ATD model to generate predicted concentrations that are then compared with the data using a cost or likelihood function. A recent study by Platt and Deriggi (2010) based on data from the FFT07 experiment demonstrated some of the limitations of theses approaches when applied to real data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, this variable has been added to the list of unknown variables to optimize. This method was systematically analyzed for sensitivity to formulation (LONG et al 2010a).…”
Section: Review Of the Uses Of The Ga-var Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Insufficient spatial and temporal resolution of the available contaminant and wind-field observations make source characterization extremely difficult (Allen, when using typical networks of fixed sensors. Given sufficient observational data, however, the problem is feasible as shown by Long, Haupt, and Young (2010). That study demonstrated the use of the Gaussian puff equation as the dispersion model in identical twin numerical experiments applying a genetic algorithm (GA) to back calculate the required source characteristics solely from observations on grids ranging from 8 Â 8 to 2 Â 2 of fixed location concentration sensors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%