2015
DOI: 10.1007/s11092-015-9229-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing self-regulated learning in higher education: a systematic literature review of self-report instruments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

3
132
0
9

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 208 publications
(163 citation statements)
references
References 74 publications
3
132
0
9
Order By: Relevance
“…But this may not always be the case and can lead to measurement error [43]. To ensure face and internal validity as well as consistency, a pilot test was conducted among 18 first and second year undergraduate students, 5 postgraduate students and 2 academic staff members before it was released via email to the target population.…”
Section: Data Collection Instrumentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But this may not always be the case and can lead to measurement error [43]. To ensure face and internal validity as well as consistency, a pilot test was conducted among 18 first and second year undergraduate students, 5 postgraduate students and 2 academic staff members before it was released via email to the target population.…”
Section: Data Collection Instrumentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the useful strategies for professional development and lifelong learning of students is Self-Regulated Learning (SRL). [89]…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is a large body of literature on SRL (for overviews, see Boekaerts et al, 2000; Zimmerman and Schunk, 2011) as well as different approaches to measuring SRL (for overviews see Boekaerts and Corno, 2005; Wirth and Leutner, 2008; Zimmerman, 2008). Although there have been several waves of SRL measurement in which various measures were developed and used (Panadero et al, 2016), a large share of studies still rely on classical self-report questionnaires (Roth et al, 2016). Typical biases like socially desirable answers or self-serving biases need to be taken into account in these classical self-assessment studies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%