The Companion to Language Assessment 2013
DOI: 10.1002/9781118411360.wbcla088
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing American Sign Language

Abstract: This chapter presents an historical account of the progress in the development of measures for assessing first language abilities in American Sign Language (ASL). In the past sign language assessment efforts were limited as they were largely based on the translation of extant measures developed for assessing English abilities. In the past two decades, the growing understanding of the linguistic properties of ASL and other signed languages and of language assessment in general has paved the way for significant … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 14 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The signs in ASL-LEX originated from several resources: previous published databases ( Mayberry et al., 2014 ; Vinson et al., 2008 ), the ASL Communicative Development Inventory (CDI) ( Anderson & Reilly, 2002 ; Caselli, Lieberman, & Pyers, 2020 ), an ASL vocabulary test ( Hoffmeister, 1999 ; Novogrodsky, Caldwell-Harris, Fish, & Hoffmeister, 2014 ), ASL Signbank ( Hochgesang, Crasborn, & Lillo-Martin, 2019 ), and from previous in-house psycholinguistic experiments ( Meade, Lee, Midgley, Holcomb, & Emmorey, 2018 ).…”
Section: Asl-lex Signsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The signs in ASL-LEX originated from several resources: previous published databases ( Mayberry et al., 2014 ; Vinson et al., 2008 ), the ASL Communicative Development Inventory (CDI) ( Anderson & Reilly, 2002 ; Caselli, Lieberman, & Pyers, 2020 ), an ASL vocabulary test ( Hoffmeister, 1999 ; Novogrodsky, Caldwell-Harris, Fish, & Hoffmeister, 2014 ), ASL Signbank ( Hochgesang, Crasborn, & Lillo-Martin, 2019 ), and from previous in-house psycholinguistic experiments ( Meade, Lee, Midgley, Holcomb, & Emmorey, 2018 ).…”
Section: Asl-lex Signsmentioning
confidence: 99%