2022
DOI: 10.1177/23328584221085247
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing School Communities Using Google Street View: A Virtual Systematic Social Observation Approach

Abstract: Little research in education has focused on school neighborhoods. We employ a novel systematic social observation tool—the internet-based School Neighborhood Assessment Protocol (iSNAP)—within Google Street View to quantify the physical characteristics of 291 preschool communities in nine U.S. cities. We find low to moderate correlations (r = −.03 to −.57) between iSNAP subscales and Census tract poverty, density, and crime, suggesting that the characteristics captured by the iSNAP are related to, yet ultimate… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 69 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One potential limitation of the study is the use of Euclidean distances for the computation of distances used in weighting rather than an approach such as a two‐step floating catchment approach or using direct GIS or similar to Google street view approaches (Luo & Wang, 2003; McCoy, Sabol, Hanno, & Odgers, 2022). Unlike the current approach which takes the simplest measure of distance possible, these other approaches could potentially allow for more informative weights to be computed, taking advantage of directly measured aspects of the environment (in the case of GIS and Google Street view studies) or by taking into consideration accessibility and ease of travel to a given location (in the case of a two‐step floating catchment approach).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One potential limitation of the study is the use of Euclidean distances for the computation of distances used in weighting rather than an approach such as a two‐step floating catchment approach or using direct GIS or similar to Google street view approaches (Luo & Wang, 2003; McCoy, Sabol, Hanno, & Odgers, 2022). Unlike the current approach which takes the simplest measure of distance possible, these other approaches could potentially allow for more informative weights to be computed, taking advantage of directly measured aspects of the environment (in the case of GIS and Google Street view studies) or by taking into consideration accessibility and ease of travel to a given location (in the case of a two‐step floating catchment approach).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%