2015
DOI: 10.1080/01490419.2015.1019656
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing SARAL/AltiKa Data in the Coastal Zone: Comparisons with HF Radar Observations

Abstract: We present an initial assessment of SARAL/AltiKa data in the coastal band. The study focuses on the Ibiza Channel where the north-south water exchanges play a key role in controlling the circulation variability in the Western Mediterranean. In this area, the track 16 of SARAL/AltiKa Downloaded by [New York University] at 03:55 27 May 2015 ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT2 intercepts the domain covered by a coastal high-frequency (HF) radar system, which provides surface currents with a range up to 60 km… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
22
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
(24 reference statements)
3
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Troupin et al (2015) compared ocean currents derived from SARAL/AltiKa altimetry, HF radar and glider measurements and found a good agreement between altimeter and glider currents, as close as 10 km from the coast. Similar results were also found by Pascual et al (2015), with further improvements foreseen from dedicated near-coast instrumental algorithms and geophysical corrections. Birol and Niño (2015) compared Jason-2 and SARAL/AltiKa data in coastal areas of the north-west Mediterranean Sea.…”
Section: Ka-band Altimetry: Altikasupporting
confidence: 73%
“…Troupin et al (2015) compared ocean currents derived from SARAL/AltiKa altimetry, HF radar and glider measurements and found a good agreement between altimeter and glider currents, as close as 10 km from the coast. Similar results were also found by Pascual et al (2015), with further improvements foreseen from dedicated near-coast instrumental algorithms and geophysical corrections. Birol and Niño (2015) compared Jason-2 and SARAL/AltiKa data in coastal areas of the north-west Mediterranean Sea.…”
Section: Ka-band Altimetry: Altikasupporting
confidence: 73%
“…Among the various alternative sensors available, coastal High Frequency Radar is unique as it provides synoptic, high frequency and high resolution data at the boundary between the ocean and the atmosphere [12]. Here, we build up on a previous study [13] aimed at evaluating SARAL/AltiKa data in the coastal ocean (7-60 km from the shore). In that study, the altimeter performance was evaluated in the Ibiza Channel (Western Mediterranean) by estimating geostrophic currents and comparing them to high frequency (HF) radar surface velocities.…”
Section: Saral-altika Capabilities To Detect Coastal Currents: Comparmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The period of study is 18 April 2013 to 8 May 2014. The same processing as in [13] is applied for HF radar and as well as for both SARAL/AltiKa and Jason-2 missions. Surface geostrophic velocities from altimetry are computed by finite differences applied to the Absolute Dynamic Topography (ADT), which is obtained by adding SLA and the SMDT-MED2014 Mean Dynamic Topography [14]).…”
Section: Saral-altika Capabilities To Detect Coastal Currents: Comparmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Altimeters can suffer from errors because of inaccuracies in the wet tropospheric correction, land contamination, and tracking uncertainties-all of which are accentuated closer to the coast. Accounting for these sources of error with enhanced algorithms allows for custom-processed coastal altimetry data sets that can now extend to within 10 km of the coast (Vignudelli et al 2011;Pascual et al 2015) with reasonable uncertainties provided that sufficient signal is present (Vignudelli et al 2005). Thus, satellite altimetry is a potentially important coastal data set, especially when other means are not available for measuring variability in remote locations.…”
Section: A Relevant Global Observationsmentioning
confidence: 99%