2013
DOI: 10.17226/18344
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing Risks to Endangered and Threatened Species from Pesticides

Abstract: The National Academy of Sciences is a private, nonprofit, self-perpetuating society of distinguished scholars engaged in scientific and engineering research, dedicated to the furtherance of science and technology and to their use for the general welfare. Upon the authority of the charter granted to it by the Congress in 1863, the Academy has a mandate that requires it to advise the federal government on scientific and technical matters. Dr. Ralph J. Cicerone is president of the National Academy of Sciences. Th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 151 publications
(183 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Such review must reasonably identify the potential impacts of assessed pesticides, but also be feasible to perform in a timely manner. This second criterion has hindered effective pesticide risk assessment in the U.S. (1)(2)(3).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Such review must reasonably identify the potential impacts of assessed pesticides, but also be feasible to perform in a timely manner. This second criterion has hindered effective pesticide risk assessment in the U.S. (1)(2)(3).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The U.S. Endangered Species Act also requires that pesticides do not negatively impact the persistence of threatened and endangered species (ESA) (1). The differing obligations of these legislative acts have made the current pesticide registration and review process time intensive with a lack of transparency and confidence among stakeholders.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For at least 50 years, scientists have recognized the potential of population models in chemical risk assessment and the last 20 years have seen a substantial volume of literature on the subject. Population models add value to ecological risk assessment in many ways. For example, they integrate discrete toxicological effects on development, reproduction, and survival into a single holistic measure, the rate of population change in response to chemical exposure; , they support environmental protection goals, which often focus on populations; ,, they help identify sensitive stages in development that have high influence on population outcomes; , they can be integrated with information on adverse outcome pathways (AOP) to improve inference of chemical effects; and they allow researchers to explore potential interactions between exposure, toxicity, and environmental conditions under which exposures occur . Despite these and other benefits, the adoption of population models for chemical risk assessment applications has been slow. ,, …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%