2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.gfs.2022.100646
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing returns to research investments in rice varietal development: Evidence from the Philippines and Bangladesh

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Additionally, the research investment on the technology showed an impressive internal rate of return (IRR) of 23 per cent, BCR at 1.67:1, further emphasizing the substantial value and desirability of the investment made in researching the seed to seed mechanization technology. The results were in accordance with Hurley et al, [18], Dikitanan et al, [19] and Brennam and Malayabayabs…”
Section: Note: Figures In Parenthesis Represents Percentage To Totalsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Additionally, the research investment on the technology showed an impressive internal rate of return (IRR) of 23 per cent, BCR at 1.67:1, further emphasizing the substantial value and desirability of the investment made in researching the seed to seed mechanization technology. The results were in accordance with Hurley et al, [18], Dikitanan et al, [19] and Brennam and Malayabayabs…”
Section: Note: Figures In Parenthesis Represents Percentage To Totalsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Quality improvements of crop varieties is important to address these global challenges (CGIAR, 2021). National and international agricultural research centers have heavily invested in varietal improvements, particularly in improving yield‐enhancing traits of staple food crops (Alston et al., 2020; Dikitanan et al., 2022), which resulted in significant increase in cereal production (Evenson & Gollin, 2003). However, the impact of varietal improvement goes beyond yield increases and may also be examined in terms of varietal turnover and quality attributes (Launio et al., 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%