2021
DOI: 10.1007/s11027-021-09937-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing relationship of forest biophysical factors with NDVI for carbon management in key coniferous strata of temperate Himalayas

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 118 publications
0
1
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Perbedaan ini disebabkan oleh perbedaan tipe penggunaan lahan sebelumnya dan luas area sampling. Dugaan stok karbon suatu lahan akan bergantung pada faktor biotik dan abiotik, seperti tipe tanah, kandungan hara, kemiringan lahan, radiasi cahaya matahari, bahkan organisme dekomposer di tanah (Gebeyehu et al, 2019;de Souza Almeida et al, 2021;Wani et al, 2021;Castaño et al, 2023). Lahan bekas kebun yang berumur muda umumnya memiliki tingkat kesuburan tanah yang rendah, sehingga memengaruhi pertumbuhan vegetasi yang secara tidak langsung berdampak pada stok karbon.…”
Section: Biomassa Vegetasi DI Atas Permukaan Tanah Dan Stok Karbonunclassified
“…Perbedaan ini disebabkan oleh perbedaan tipe penggunaan lahan sebelumnya dan luas area sampling. Dugaan stok karbon suatu lahan akan bergantung pada faktor biotik dan abiotik, seperti tipe tanah, kandungan hara, kemiringan lahan, radiasi cahaya matahari, bahkan organisme dekomposer di tanah (Gebeyehu et al, 2019;de Souza Almeida et al, 2021;Wani et al, 2021;Castaño et al, 2023). Lahan bekas kebun yang berumur muda umumnya memiliki tingkat kesuburan tanah yang rendah, sehingga memengaruhi pertumbuhan vegetasi yang secara tidak langsung berdampak pada stok karbon.…”
Section: Biomassa Vegetasi DI Atas Permukaan Tanah Dan Stok Karbonunclassified
“…The low NDVI values indicated that there was no vegetation cover (the ground cover was desert, bare earth, water body, ice, glacier, etc), and considering that the average growing season NDVI = 0.1 was always used as the threshold value in related research [22,23], regions with minimum NDVI ws values below 0.1 during 2001-2015 were discarded from the final analysis [23,51]. Given that the value of NDVI varies with the different forest properties, for example, NDVI increases in a nonlinear manner with the increase in stock volume/forest biomass/age/height [52][53][54], the original value of NDVI will interfere with our research that explores the potential impacts of forest properties on forest recovery paths. Thus, to reflect the relative changes in forest vigor and facilitate (1)…”
Section: Remote Sensing Vegetation Indexmentioning
confidence: 99%